Paper · 2014

Effects of micro drip irrigation on the leaf physiological characteristics and yield of cassava

Luo Xing-l

8
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking cassava cultivar ‘SC205' as materials,the effects of micro drip irrigation on leaf physiological characteristics and yield of cassava were investigated by comparing three irrigation methods including micro drip irrigation,micro spray irrigation and non-irrigation.The results showed that compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%,the chlorophyll content increased by 6.86%,the soluble protein content increased by 27.08%,the leaf dry weight increased by 12.60%,the soluble sugar content reduced by 24.48% and the yield increased by 85.07%.The result indicated that micro drip irrigation not only could improve water use efficiency to enhance drought resistance of cassava,but also could improve the photosynthetic efficiency of cassava,then promote cassava growth and root tuber yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro drip irrigation increased cassava leaf moisture by 8.99% compared with no irrigation.

Material
SC205t1
Treatment
micro drip irrigatione1
Outcome
leaf moisturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.99%e0
Comparator
non-irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–545 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
t1

“SC205”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro drip irrigation increased cassava chlorophyll content by 6.86% compared with no irrigation.

Material
SC205t1
Treatment
micro drip irrigatione1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.86%e0
Comparator
non-irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%,the chlorophyll content increased by 6.86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
t1

“SC205”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro drip irrigation increased cassava soluble protein content by 27.08% compared with no irrigation.

Material
SC205t1
Treatment
micro drip irrigatione1
Outcome
soluble protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.08%e0
Comparator
non-irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soluble protein content increased by 27.08%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
t1

“SC205”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro drip irrigation increased cassava leaf dry weight by 12.60% compared with no irrigation.

Material
SC205t1
Treatment
micro drip irrigatione1
Outcome
leaf dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.60%e0
Comparator
non-irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf dry weight increased by 12.60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
t1

“SC205”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro drip irrigation reduced cassava soluble sugar content by 24.48% compared with no irrigation.

Material
SC205t1
Treatment
micro drip irrigatione1
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24.48%e0
Comparator
non-irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soluble sugar content reduced by 24.48%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–720 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
t1

“SC205”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro drip irrigation increased cassava yield by 85.07% compared with no irrigation.

Material
SC205t1
Treatment
micro drip irrigatione1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
85.07%e0
Comparator
non-irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield increased by 85.07%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the non-irrigation,under micro drip irrigation method,the leaf moisture,chlorophyll content,soluble protein content and dry weight increased significantly,but the leaf soluble sugar content decreased,the leaf moisture increased by 8.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–95 · show in text ↑
t1

“SC205”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred improved water use efficiency and drought resistance under micro drip irrigation.

Treatment
micro drip irrigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“micro drip irrigation not only could improve water use efficiency to enhance drought resistance of cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–887 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred improved photosynthetic efficiency and consequent cassava growth and root tuber yield.

Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
cassava growth and root tuber yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could improve the photosynthetic efficiency of cassava,then promote cassava growth and root tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1001 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.