Abstract
【Objective】 By studying the regulating effect of macronutrient soluble fertilizers on cotton growth and yield,this project aims to research the fertilizer efficiency and yield- increasing effect in the hope of providing basis for drip irrigation cotton integrated water and fertilizer technology developing and macronutrient soluble fertilizer fair usage.【 Method】 Four representative macronutrient soluble fertilizers were chosen to analyze the cotton biological traits and yield,fertilizer efficiency,economic benefits and some other aspects,with the conventional applying base fertilizer methods as the control by the plot trial.【 Result】 The difference of cotton biological characteristics was not significant,but the yield difference was significant.Yield level of each treatment order was:T5 T2 T4 T3 T1.NPK agronomic efficiency showed significant differences,and the size of the order was:T5 T2 T4 T3.The average utilization of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium were 57.3%,34.2%and 27.7%.T5 treatment generated the best economic benefits.【 Conclusion】 The yield of the cotton which macronutrients soluble fertilizer average was applied to reached 5218.6kg/hm~2,and comparing with control,4.5 percent was increased.The NPK ratio of optimal yield and benefit macronutrient soluble fertilizers was 10-30-10.When high potassium and low nitrogen soluble fertilizer are applied on Northern Xinjiang cotton,base fertilizer combined with topdressing nitrogen fertilizer potash should be adjusted.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
The macronutrient soluble fertilizers did not significantly change cotton biological characteristics compared with conventional base fertilizer.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume3 - Treatment
- macronutrient soluble fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- cotton biological characteristicse3
- Direction
- not significante3
- Comparator
- conventional applying base fertilizer methodse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“Four representative macronutrient soluble fertilizers were chosen”
e2“with the conventional applying base fertilizer methods as the control”
e3“The difference of cotton biological characteristics was not significant”
Claim · model-written summary
The macronutrient soluble fertilizers significantly changed cotton yield compared with conventional base fertilizer.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- macronutrient soluble fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Comparator
- conventional applying base fertilizer methodse2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“Four representative macronutrient soluble fertilizers were chosen”
e2“with the conventional applying base fertilizer methods as the control”
e4“the yield difference was significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton yield level by treatment ranks T5 > T2 > T4 > T3 > T1.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- macronutrient soluble fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- Yield level of each treatment ordere5
- Direction
- T5 T2 T4 T3 T1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“Four representative macronutrient soluble fertilizers were chosen”
e5“Yield level of each treatment order was:T5 T2 T4 T3 T1”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK agronomic efficiency differed significantly among treatments, ordered T5 > T2 > T4 > T3.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- macronutrient soluble fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- NPK agronomic efficiencye6
- Direction
- T5 T2 T4 T3e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“Four representative macronutrient soluble fertilizers were chosen”
e6“NPK agronomic efficiency showed significant differences,and the size of the order was:T5 T2 T4 T3”
Claim · model-written summary
Average nitrogen utilization by cotton was 57.3%.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- average utilization of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassiume7
- Value
- 57.3%e7
- Qualifier
- nitrogene7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e7“The average utilization of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium were 57.3%,34.2%and 27.7%”
Claim · model-written summary
Average phosphorus utilization by cotton was 34.2%.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- average utilization of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassiume7
- Value
- 34.2%e7
- Qualifier
- phosphoruse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e7“The average utilization of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium were 57.3%,34.2%and 27.7%”
Claim · model-written summary
Average potassium utilization by cotton was 27.7%.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- average utilization of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassiume7
- Value
- 27.7%e7
- Qualifier
- potassiume7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e7“The average utilization of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium were 57.3%,34.2%and 27.7%”
Claim · model-written summary
The T5 treatment gave the best economic benefits.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- T5e1
- Outcome
- economic benefitse1
- Direction
- beste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“T5 treatment generated the best economic benefits”
Claim · model-written summary
Macronutrient soluble fertilizer application gave cotton yield of 5218.6 kg/hm2.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- macronutrients soluble fertilizere1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 5218.6kg/hm~2e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“The yield of the cotton which macronutrients soluble fertilizer average was applied to reached 5218.6kg/hm~2”
Claim · model-written summary
Macronutrient soluble fertilizer application increased cotton yield by 4.5 percent over control.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- macronutrients soluble fertilizere1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 4.5 percente2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“The yield of the cotton which macronutrients soluble fertilizer average was applied to reached 5218.6kg/hm~2”
e2“comparing with control,4.5 percent was increased”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimal NPK ratio for yield and benefit of macronutrient soluble fertilizers is 10-30-10.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- NPK ratio of optimal yield and benefite1
- Value
- 10-30-10e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“The NPK ratio of optimal yield and benefit macronutrient soluble fertilizers was 10-30-10”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend adjusting base and topdressing fertilizer when high-potassium, low-nitrogen soluble fertilizer is applied to Northern Xinjiang cotton.
Verbatim
t0“Macronutrient Soluble Fertilizers Application on Cotton”
e1“When high potassium and low nitrogen soluble fertilizer are applied on Northern Xinjiang cotton, base fertilizer combined with topdressing nitrogen fertilizer potash should be adjusted”
The same questions in other papers
macronutrient · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.