Abstract
This paper gives a main dicussion about the effectiveness of fertilization for cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping by compared to single cotton fields.The findings show that the cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping not only maintains the high cotton yield but also improves obviously economic profits and efficiency of water-using and also shows the great adaptation to the present water resources of this cotton-zone.750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizer can make economic profits of cotton fields and efficiency of water-using more stable and higher.The main purpose of fertilization is to improve the economic profits and efficiency of water-using of intercropping cotton fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton and red pepper intercropping maintained high cotton yield relative to single cotton fields.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- cotton-cluster redpepper intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- cotton yielde0
- Direction
- maintains the highe0
- Comparator
- single cotton fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping by compared to single cotton fields.The findings show that the cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping not only maintains the high cotton yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton and red pepper intercropping improved economic profits and water use efficiency relative to single cotton fields.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- cotton-cluster redpepper intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- economic profits and efficiency of water-usinge0
- Direction
- improves obviouslye0
- Comparator
- single cotton fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping by compared to single cotton fields.The findings show that the cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping not only maintains the high cotton yield but also improves obviously economic profits and efficiency of water-using”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped cotton showed adaptation to the cotton zone’s water resources.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“shows the great adaptation to the present water resources of this cotton-zone”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizer made cotton field economic profits and water use efficiency more stable and higher.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- 750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizere0
- Outcome
- economic profits of cotton fields and efficiency of water-usinge0
- Direction
- more stable and highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizer can make economic profits of cotton fields and efficiency of water-using more stable and higher”
The same questions in other papers
potassium sulfate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.