Paper · 2008

The Effective Research of Fertilization for Cotton-cluster Redpepper Intercropping

Xiao Yun-qing

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper gives a main dicussion about the effectiveness of fertilization for cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping by compared to single cotton fields.The findings show that the cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping not only maintains the high cotton yield but also improves obviously economic profits and efficiency of water-using and also shows the great adaptation to the present water resources of this cotton-zone.750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizer can make economic profits of cotton fields and efficiency of water-using more stable and higher.The main purpose of fertilization is to improve the economic profits and efficiency of water-using of intercropping cotton fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and red pepper intercropping maintained high cotton yield relative to single cotton fields.

Treatment
cotton-cluster redpepper intercroppinge0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
maintains the highe0
Comparator
single cotton fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping by compared to single cotton fields.The findings show that the cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping not only maintains the high cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton and red pepper intercropping improved economic profits and water use efficiency relative to single cotton fields.

Treatment
cotton-cluster redpepper intercroppinge0
Outcome
economic profits and efficiency of water-usinge0
Direction
improves obviouslye0
Comparator
single cotton fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping by compared to single cotton fields.The findings show that the cotton-cluster redpepper intercropping not only maintains the high cotton yield but also improves obviously economic profits and efficiency of water-using”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–335 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped cotton showed adaptation to the cotton zone’s water resources.

Outcome
adaptation to the present water resourcese0
Direction
great adaptatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“shows the great adaptation to the present water resources of this cotton-zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizer made cotton field economic profits and water use efficiency more stable and higher.

Treatment
750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizere0
Outcome
economic profits of cotton fields and efficiency of water-usinge0
Direction
more stable and highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“750.0 kg/ha K2SO4 compound fertilizer can make economic profits of cotton fields and efficiency of water-using more stable and higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–556 · show in text ↑

potassium sulfate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

104 papers: 85 positive, 19 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.