Paper · 2021 · Scientific Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Water Stress on Cotton Plants as Affected by Potassium and Nano chitosan-NPK Fertilizer

Mohamed Sarhan; Samah Bashanday; S. Abd El-Gayed

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The present work was aimed to investigate using of potassium fertilizer as well as nano chitosan-NPK to alleviate the negative effect of water stress and its effect on cotton plant and some water relations. Two field experiments were conducted to study the possibility of using potassium fertilizer and nano chitosan-NPK to eliminate the negative impacts of water stress. The design of the experiment was split design plot, where number of irrigation treatments (6 and 9) were arranged in main plots, while potassium fertilization, i.e., K1= 96 kg K/ha as potassium sulphate, K2= 96 kg K/ha + twice foliar application of 2% potassium sulphate, K3= 96 kg K/ha + twice foliar application with 2% nano chitosan-NPK, K4= four times of foliar application with 2% potassium sulphate, and K5= four times of foliar application with 2% nano chitosan-NPK. The results obtained indicated that K3 followed by K2 which achieved the favourable values of plant height, first fruiting node, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index, lint percentage, seed cotton yield. Neither potassium fertilization nor irrigation number altered fiber properties. The data of the interaction showed the combined 96 kg K/ha as potassium sulphate + twice foliar application with 2% nano chitosan-NPK can diminish the negative effect of drought stress under deficit conditions, with higher seed cotton yield nearly equal to those obtained under full irrigation. It could be concluded that potassium fertilization and nano chitosan-NPK can improve cotton plant tolerance to water stress and enhance cotton productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K3 achieved favorable growth, boll, lint and seed cotton yield values, followed by K2.

Taxon
cotton plantGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
K3e0
Outcome
plant height, first fruiting node, number of fruiting branches/plante0
Direction
favourablee0
Comparator
K2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained indicated that K3 followed by K2 which achieved the favourable values of plant height, first fruiting node, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index, lint percentage, seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither potassium fertilization nor irrigation number altered cotton fiber properties.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
potassium fertilization nor irrigation numbere0
Outcome
fiber propertiese0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither potassium fertilization nor irrigation number altered fiber properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K3 under deficit irrigation yielded nearly as much seed cotton as full irrigation.

Taxon
Cotton PlantsGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
96 kg K/ha as potassium sulphate + twice foliar application with 2% nano chitosan-NPKe0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under deficit conditionse0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data of the interaction showed the combined 96 kg K/ha as potassium sulphate + twice foliar application with 2% nano chitosan-NPK can diminish the negative effect of drought stress under deficit conditions, with higher seed cotton yield nearly equal to those obtained under full irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–29 · show in text ↑

potassium sulfate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.