Paper · 2009 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of irrigation amount and stage on nitrogen accumulation,distribution,translocation and soil NO_3~--N content in high-yield wheat

Tonghua Wu

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Irrigation is one of the most important measures to regulate plant metabolism in winter wheat(Triticum aestivum L.).However,unsuitable irrigation will cause the decline of nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield.To determine the effects of irrigation amount and stage on nitrogen accumulation,distribution,translocation and soil NO3--N content under the condition of high yield at the level of 9000 kg per hectare,the field experiment was carried out on high fertility soil with organic matter 15.20 g/kg,alkali-hydrolysable N 77.13 mg/kg, available P 29.70 mg/kg,and available K 121.58 mg/kg in Shiwang village,Yanzhou city,Shandong province,China,using the wheat cultivar Jimai 22 which has high yield and medium gluten potential.Five treatments were set with no irrigation (W0),irrigated before sowing(W1),irrigated before sowing and at jointing stage,respectively(W2),irrigated before sowing,at jointing and anthesis stages,respectively(W3),irrigated before sowing and at anthesis stage,respectively(W4).The irrigation amount each time was 60 mm.There were three replicates for each treatment.The plot area was 2 m×6 m and a 1 m wide protective belt was left between every two adjacent experimental plots.The basic seedling number was 180 plant/m2.The results indicated that,the nitrogen accumulation amount in plant and grain and the nitrogen translocation amount(nitrogen accumulation in vegetative organs at anthesis stage—nitrogen accumulation in vegetative organs at maturity,NTA) from vegetative organs to grain after anthesis in treatments which irrigation were supplied were significantly higher than those of treatment W0.With the increasing of irrigation amount,the nitrogen accumulation amount of wheat plant,NTA and nitrogen translocation efficiency(NTA/nitrogen accumulation in vegetative organs at anthesis stage,TE) from vegetative organs to grain after anthesis were increased at first then decreased,and those of treatment W2 were the highest.The soil NO-3-N content in 0200 cm soil layer decreased first,increased then,and decreased again as wheat growth process progress,and reached its lowest content at jointing stage.At maturity stage,the soil NO-3-N content in 0-40 cm soil layer of treatment W0 was significantly higher than that of treatments which irrigation were supplied.With the increasing of irrigation amount,the soil NO-3-N content in 100160 cm soil layer was increased,that of treatment W2 was significantly lower than treatment W3 and W4,and there were no significant differences in 160200 cm soil layer among these treatments.With the increasing of irrigation amount,nitrogen uptake efficiency,nitrogen harvest index and nitrogen fertilizer productive efficiency were increased at first then decreased,and those of treatment W2 were the highest.But nitrogen use efficiency was gradually decreased,and that of treatment W0 was the highest while there was no significant difference among treatment W2,W3 and W4.Based on a comprehensive consideration of nitrogen use efficiency,grain yield and soil NO-3-N content,the irrigation amount and stage recommended under the condition of this research was the treatment W2 which irrigated before sowing and at jointing stage respectively,the irrigation amount each time was 60 mm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated treatments had significantly higher plant and grain nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen translocation than W0.

Treatment
irrigatione2
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation amount in plant and graine1
Direction
highere2
Comparator
treatment W0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e1

“the nitrogen accumulation amount in plant and grain and the nitrogen translocation amount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1368 · show in text ↑
e2

“in treatments which irrigation were supplied were significantly higher than those of treatment W0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1634 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen translocation efficiency rose then fell with increasing irrigation amount, highest at W2.

Treatment
irrigation amounte3
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation amount of wheat plante3
Direction
increased at first then decreasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the increasing of irrigation amount,the nitrogen accumulation amount of wheat plant,NTA and nitrogen translocation efficiency(NTA/nitrogen accumulation in vegetative organs at anthesis stage,TE) from vegetative organs to grain after anthesis were increased at first then decreased,and those of treatment W2 were the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1963 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NO3-N content in the 0-200 cm layer decreased, then increased, then decreased again over the growth period, lowest at jointing.

Organ / stage
jointing stagee4
Outcome
soil NO-3-N content in 0200 cm soil layere4
Direction
decreased first,increased then,and decreased againe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e4

“The soil NO-3-N content in 0200 cm soil layer decreased first,increased then,and decreased again as wheat growth process progress,and reached its lowest content at jointing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At maturity, soil NO3-N in 0-40 cm under W0 was significantly higher than under irrigated treatments.

Organ / stage
maturity stagee5
Treatment
treatment W0e5
Outcome
soil NO-3-N content in 0-40 cm soil layere5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
treatments which irrigation were suppliede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e5

“At maturity stage,the soil NO-3-N content in 0-40 cm soil layer of treatment W0 was significantly higher than that of treatments which irrigation were supplied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2302 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NO3-N in the 100-160 cm layer increased with increasing irrigation amount.

Treatment
irrigation amounte6
Outcome
soil NO-3-N content in 100160 cm soil layere6
Direction
increasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e6

“With the increasing of irrigation amount,the soil NO-3-N content in 100160 cm soil layer was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2303–2405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil NO3-N in the 100-160 cm layer under W2 was significantly lower than under W3 and W4.

Treatment
treatment W2e1
Outcome
soil NO-3-N content in 100160 cm soil layere7
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
treatment W3 and W4e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e7

“the soil NO-3-N content in 100160 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2344–2391 · show in text ↑
e1

“that of treatment W2 was significantly lower than treatment W3 and W4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2406–2475 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences in soil NO3-N in the 160-200 cm layer among treatments.

Outcome
significant differences in 160200 cm soil layere0
Qualifier
among these treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were no significant differences in 160200 cm soil layer among these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2480–2564 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake efficiency, nitrogen harvest index and nitrogen fertilizer productive efficiency rose then fell with increasing irrigation amount, highest at W2.

Treatment
irrigation amounte0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake efficiencye0
Direction
increased at first then decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“With the increasing of irrigation amount,nitrogen uptake efficiency,nitrogen harvest index and nitrogen fertilizer productive efficiency were increased at first then decreased,and those of treatment W2 were the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2565–2783 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency decreased gradually with increasing irrigation, and was highest under W0.

Treatment
treatment W0e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
gradually decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“But nitrogen use efficiency was gradually decreased,and that of treatment W0 was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2784–2876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency under W0 was highest, with no significant difference among W2, W3 and W4.

Treatment
treatment W0e0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
treatment W2,W3 and W4e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“But nitrogen use efficiency was gradually decreased,and that of treatment W0 was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2784–2876 · show in text ↑
e1

“while there was no significant difference among treatment W2,W3 and W4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2877–2947 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation before sowing and at jointing, 60 mm each time, is recommended for this high-yield wheat condition.

Treatment
irrigated before sowing and at jointing stagee0
Outcome
irrigation amount and stage recommendede0
Value
60 mme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“high-yield wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“the irrigation amount and stage recommended under the condition of this research was the treatment W2 which irrigated before sowing and at jointing stage respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3050–3216 · show in text ↑
e1

“the irrigation amount each time was 60 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3217–3258 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.