Paper · 2014 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Growth and Photosynthetic Traits of Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )

FU Qian-we

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】The purpose of this study is to provide theoretical guidance for efficient fertilization technique of jujube by comparatively studying the amount of growth,photosynthetic parameters,chlorophyll content,fruit yield and quality in four different fertilization methods( furrow fertilization,hole fertilization,radial fertilization and broadcast fertilization). 【Method】Photosynthetic instrument CIRAS- 2 was applied to mensurate the photosynthetic parameters,SPAD- 502 chlorophyll meter was applied to mensurate the chlorophyll content,anthrone colorimetry method was applied to mensurate the fruit soluble sugar content,and Na OH titration method was applied to mensurate the fruit total acid. 【Result】Radial fertilization compared with CK,can increase diameter expanding 19. 7%,branches length 3. 97 centimeters,branches diameter 12. 4%,length of bearing branchlet 1. 31 centimeters. Under the different fertilization methods,the net photosynthetic rate of radial fertilization waaa 32. 7%,19. 9%,12. 1% and 2. 7% higher than those without fertilizer treatment,broadcast fertilization,furrow fertilization,hole fertilization respectively. The chlorophyll content of hole fertilization treatment was significantly higher than other treatments. The yield per plant of radial fertilization reached to 0. 77 kg / plant,123%,45% and 35%,11% higher than the CK,broadcast fertilization,furrow fertiliza-tion,hole fertilization respectively. The sugar acid ratio of furrow fertilization and radial fertilization were higher. 【Conclusion】The radial fertilization was a priority fertilization method for high- efficiency cultivation,as in virtue of the stronger photosynthetic efficiency,it can evidently improve fruit yield and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial fertilization increased diameter expansion by 19.7% versus CK.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
Radial fertilizatione0
Outcome
diameter expandinge0
Direction
increasee0
Value
19. 7%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Radial fertilization compared with CK,can increase diameter expanding 19. 7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial fertilization increased branch length by 3.97 centimeters versus CK.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
Radial fertilizatione0
Outcome
branches lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3. 97 centimeterse0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Radial fertilization compared with CK,can increase diameter expanding 19. 7%,branches length 3. 97 centimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial fertilization increased branch diameter by 12.4% versus CK.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
Radial fertilizatione0
Outcome
branches diametere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12. 4%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Radial fertilization compared with CK,can increase diameter expanding 19. 7%,branches length 3. 97 centimeters,branches diameter 12. 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial fertilization increased bearing branchlet length by 1.31 centimeters versus CK.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
Radial fertilizatione0
Outcome
length of bearing branchlete0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1. 31 centimeterse0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Radial fertilization compared with CK,can increase diameter expanding 19. 7%,branches length 3. 97 centimeters,branches diameter 12. 4%,length of bearing branchlet 1. 31 centimeters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial fertilization raised net photosynthetic rate by 32.7%, 19.9%, 12.1%, and 2.7% against no fertilizer, broadcast, furrow, and hole fertilization, respectively.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
radial fertilizatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
32. 7%,19. 9%,12. 1% and 2. 7%e0
Comparator
without fertilizer treatment,broadcast fertilization,furrow fertilization,hole fertilizatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“net photosynthetic rate of radial fertilization waaa 32. 7%,19. 9%,12. 1% and 2. 7% higher than those without fertilizer treatment,broadcast fertilization,furrow fertilization,hole fertilization respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hole fertilization had significantly higher chlorophyll content than other treatments.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
hole fertilization treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The chlorophyll content of hole fertilization treatment was significantly higher than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial fertilization yielded 0.77 kg per plant, higher than CK, broadcast, furrow, and hole fertilization.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
radial fertilizatione0
Outcome
yield per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
0. 77 kg / plante0
Qualifier
123%,45% and 35%,11%e0
Comparator
CK,broadcast fertilization,furrow fertiliza-tion,hole fertilizatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield per plant of radial fertilization reached to 0. 77 kg / plant,123%,45% and 35%,11% higher than the CK,broadcast fertilization,furrow fertiliza-tion,hole fertilization respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1442 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow fertilization had a higher sugar acid ratio.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
furrow fertilizatione0
Outcome
sugar acid ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sugar acid ratio of furrow fertilization and radial fertilization were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial fertilization had a higher sugar acid ratio.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
radial fertilizatione0
Outcome
sugar acid ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sugar acid ratio of furrow fertilization and radial fertilization were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1525 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors prioritized radial fertilization for efficient cultivation.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Outcome
radial fertilization was a priority fertilization method for high- efficiency cultivatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Jujube( Ziziphus jujuba Mill. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The radial fertilization was a priority fertilization method for high- efficiency cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1632 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · growth · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.