Paper · 2012 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

The possible mechanism of cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film——From the perspective of growth and nutrient

Tian Chang-yan

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The premature senescence of cotton under drip irrigation below mulch film(DI) is much more widespread than under flooding irrigation(FI),and the change of plants nutrient under DI has been regarded as a possible influencing factor.In this study,a field experiment was conducted to investigate the cotton growth and nutrient status under DI in comparison to FI.The results indicate that there are severe symptoms of premature senescence at the later growth stages of cotton under DI,while there are not the symptoms under FI.At 125 DAS(late boll stage),the shoot biomass under DI is significantly higher than that under FI,while root biomasses show the opposite trend,and the shoot/root ratio under DI is significantly higher than that under FI.The shoot dry weight of plants grown under DI is abruptly decreased from 125 DAS(late boll stage) to 160 DAS(harvest stage).Field observations indicate the main reason for the decrease is the shedding of a large number of leaves,squares and bolls.The shoot to root ratio under DI is also decreased to the same level as that of the FI treatment.To analysis the cotton leaf nutrition,it would be found that the nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of old leaves are lower than those of young leaves under both of DI and FI at the later growth stages,whereas the potassium concentration is opposite.The K concentration of young leaves under DI is lower than that under FI,and the K concentration of cotton shoot also shows a same trend.These results indicate that the premature senescence of cotton under DI may be that the K need of the shoots exceeds that K amount of the roots is able to supply.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Premature senescence of cotton is more widespread under drip irrigation below mulch film than under flood irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation below mulch filme0
Outcome
premature senescencee0
Direction
more widespreade0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The premature senescence of cotton under drip irrigation below mulch film(DI) is much more widespread than under flooding irrigation(FI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass of cotton at the late boll stage was significantly higher under DI than under FI.

Organ / stage
late boll stagee1
Treatment
DIe1
Outcome
shoot biomasse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
FIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“At 125 DAS(late boll stage),the shoot biomass under DI is significantly higher than that under FI,while root biomasses show the opposite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root biomass of cotton showed the opposite trend to shoot biomass under DI compared with FI.

Treatment
DIe1
Outcome
root biomassese1
Direction
opposite trende1
Comparator
FIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“At 125 DAS(late boll stage),the shoot biomass under DI is significantly higher than that under FI,while root biomasses show the opposite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot/root ratio of cotton was significantly higher under DI than under FI.

Treatment
DIe2
Outcome
shoot/root ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
FIe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“and the shoot/root ratio under DI is significantly higher than that under FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight of cotton under DI abruptly decreased from the late boll stage to harvest.

Organ / stage
harvest stagee3
Treatment
DIe3
Outcome
shoot dry weighte3
Direction
abruptly decreasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The shoot dry weight of plants grown under DI is abruptly decreased from 125 DAS(late boll stage) to 160 DAS(harvest stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–867 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shedding of many leaves, squares and bolls was the main reason for the shoot dry weight decrease under DI.

Outcome
the decreasee4
Qualifier
shedding of a large number of leaves,squares and bollse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“Field observations indicate the main reason for the decrease is the shedding of a large number of leaves,squares and bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shoot to root ratio under DI decreased to the same level as under FI.

Treatment
DIe5
Outcome
shoot to root ratioe5
Direction
decreasede5
Comparator
FIe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“The shoot to root ratio under DI is also decreased to the same level as that of the FI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1087 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of old leaves were lower than in young leaves under DI and FI at later growth stages.

Organ / stage
old leavese6
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of old leavese6
Direction
lowere6
Qualifier
at the later growth stagese6
Comparator
young leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e6

“the nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of old leaves are lower than those of young leaves under both of DI and FI at the later growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium concentration of old leaves was opposite to that of young leaves.

Outcome
potassium concentratione7
Direction
oppositee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton premature senescence under drip irrigation below mulch film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“whereas the potassium concentration is opposite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium concentration of young leaves was lower under DI than under FI.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
K concentration of young leavese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
FIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The K concentration of young leaves under DI is lower than that under FI,and the K concentration of cotton shoot also shows a same trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium concentration of cotton shoot showed the same trend under DI as young-leaf potassium.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
K concentration of cotton shoote0
Direction
same trende0
Comparator
FIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The K concentration of young leaves under DI is lower than that under FI,and the K concentration of cotton shoot also shows a same trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1478 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Premature senescence under DI may result from shoot K demand exceeding the K supply from roots.

Treatment
DIe1
Outcome
premature senescencee1
Qualifier
the K need of the shoots exceeds that K amount of the roots is able to supplye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the premature senescence of cotton under DI may be that the K need of the shoots exceeds that K amount of the roots is able to supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1640 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.