Paper · 2008 · Zhongcaoyao

Inhibitory activity of substance in seed and sarcocarp of Phellodendron amurense

Yang Xiao-cui

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objective Looking into the causes of self-regeneration obstacle of the wild Phellodendron amurense population in order to provide the reference for the sutdy of the germination mechanism. MethodsThe germination and seedling growth were observed by taking cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense as the tested objects and the sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense were extracted by alcohol and ethyl ether. Results The extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense could decrease the germination rate of cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense seed, also inhibit the seedling growth in different levels. The inhibitory effect was getting stronger and stronger following the concentration increased. The ethyl ether extract showed the best inhibitory effect, while the water extract had no significant effect. The embryo, emdosperm, and cotyledon of P. amurense were extracted by distilled water, and among them the cotyledon had the strongest inhibition. Conclusion There are some substances with the better inhibitory effect in the sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense, which can inhibit the growth of itself and other plants significantly. The substance with the inhibitory effect exits mainly in cotyledon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. amurense extracts decreased cabbage germination rate.

Treatment
extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurensee0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense could decrease the germination rate of cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense seed, also inhibit the seedling growth in different levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. amurense extracts inhibitd cabbage seedling growth.

Treatment
extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurensee0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense could decrease the germination rate of cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense seed, also inhibit the seedling growth in different levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. amurense extracts decreased wheat germination rate.

Treatment
extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurensee0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense could decrease the germination rate of cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense seed, also inhibit the seedling growth in different levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. amurense extracts inhibitd wheat seedling growth.

Treatment
extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurensee0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense could decrease the germination rate of cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense seed, also inhibit the seedling growth in different levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. amurense extracts decreased P. amurense germination rate.

Taxon
P. amurensePhellodendron amurensee0
Treatment
extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurensee0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phellodendron amurense
Phellodendron amurense · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense could decrease the germination rate of cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense seed, also inhibit the seedling growth in different levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. amurense extracts inhibitd P. amurense seedling growth.

Taxon
P. amurensePhellodendron amurensee0
Treatment
extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurensee0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phellodendron amurense
Phellodendron amurense · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract in sarcocarp and seed of P. amurense could decrease the germination rate of cabbage, wheat, and P. amurense seed, also inhibit the seedling growth in different levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition strengthened with extract concentration.

Taxon
Phellodendron amurensePhellodendron amurenset0
Treatment
concentratione0
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
stronger and strongere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phellodendron amurense
Phellodendron amurense · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effect was getting stronger and stronger following the concentration increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phellodendron amurense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethyl ether extract showed the strongest inhibition.

Taxon
Phellodendron amurensePhellodendron amurenset0
Treatment
ethyl ether extracte0
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phellodendron amurense
Phellodendron amurense · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ethyl ether extract showed the best inhibitory effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phellodendron amurense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extract had no significant inhibitory effect.

Taxon
Phellodendron amurensePhellodendron amurenset0
Treatment
water extracte0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phellodendron amurense
Phellodendron amurense · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the water extract had no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phellodendron amurense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotyledon extract showed the strongest inhibition among the seed tissues.

Taxon
P. amurensePhellodendron amurensee0
Treatment
cotyledone0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
strongeste0
Comparator
embryo, emdosperme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phellodendron amurense
Phellodendron amurense · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The embryo, emdosperm, and cotyledon of P. amurense were extracted by distilled water, and among them the cotyledon had the strongest inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phellodendron amurense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 42 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

228 papers in the same direction as this paper · 206 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.