Paper · 2007

Effects of Boron on Seminal Quality of Doubled Haploid Population Derived from Two Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.) Cultivars with Low and High Boron Nutrition Efficiency

Nian Fuzhao

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In field trial,effects of boron on seminal yield and quality of Ningyou No.7-high boron(B) efficient cultivar and Tapidor-low B efficient cultivar,as well as their doubled haploid(DH) population(n=186) were studied.The results showed that when enough boron fertilizer were supplied to the soil,glucosindate and erucic acid content would be decreased,at the same time,oleic acid and oil centent would be increased.There was no significant correlation between B nutrition efficiency and seed quality, so it is not feasible to screen high B efficient cultivar by seminal quality indexes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate boron fertilizer decreased seed glucosindate content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
enough boron fertilizere0
Outcome
glucosindatee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when enough boron fertilizer were supplied to the soil,glucosindate and erucic acid content would be decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate boron fertilizer decreased seed erucic acid content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
enough boron fertilizere0
Outcome
erucic acid contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when enough boron fertilizer were supplied to the soil,glucosindate and erucic acid content would be decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate boron fertilizer increased seed oleic acid content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
enough boron fertilizere0
Outcome
oleic acide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when enough boron fertilizer were supplied to the soil,glucosindate and erucic acid content would be decreased,at the same time,oleic acid and oil centent would be increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate boron fertilizer increased seed oil content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
enough boron fertilizere0
Outcome
oil centente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when enough boron fertilizer were supplied to the soil,glucosindate and erucic acid content would be decreased,at the same time,oleic acid and oil centent would be increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron nutrition efficiency was not significantly correlated with seed quality.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Outcome
seed qualitye0
Comparator
B nutrition efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant correlation between B nutrition efficiency and seed quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judge seed quality indexes infeasible for screening high boron efficient cultivars.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Outcome
screen high B efficient cultivar by seminal quality indexese0

Verbatim

e0

“it is not feasible to screen high B efficient cultivar by seminal quality indexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

boron atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.