Paper · 2015

Effects of Nutrient Solution with Different Nitrogen Forms and Ratio on Growth and Physiological Properties of Tobacco Seedlings

Dong Bao-zh

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to optimize the floating system nutrient solution for growing areas of burnt- sweetness type tobacco in Hunan province under low temperature and little sunshine,effects of different nitrogen forms,concentrations and proportions of different types of ammonium salts to nitric nitrogen on growth and physiological characteristics of tobacco seedlings were studied with Yunyan 87 as material. The results indicated that treatment of nutrient solution with 100% NO-3- N was advantageous to roots elongation and chlorophyll synthesis,while its blade,stem girth,root activity and nitrate reductase activity of tobacco seedlings were worse than those of treatment of nutrient solution with 50% NO-3- N + 50% NH-4- N. The agronomic traits and physiological index of tobacco seedlings in treatment of N concentration of 500 mg / L or 700 mg / L were better than those in others treatment. The agronomic traits,chlorophyll content,roots activity and NAR activity in treatment of mixed ligand nutrient solution with ammonium hydrogenphosphate and NO-3- N were better than those of nutrient solution with ammonium nitrate,and the optimal ratio of NO-3- N and NH-4- N was 1∶ 1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution with 100% NO-3-N was advantageous for root elongation and chlorophyll synthesis.

Treatment
100% NO-3- Ne1
Outcome
roots elongation and chlorophyll synthesise1
Direction
advantageouse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment of nutrient solution with 100% NO-3- N was advantageous to roots elongation and chlorophyll synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution with 100% NO-3-N gave worse blade and stem girth than 50% NO-3-N plus 50% NH-4-N.

Treatment
100% NO-3- Ne1
Outcome
blade,stem girthe2
Direction
worsee2
Comparator
50% NO-3- N + 50% NH-4- Ne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment of nutrient solution with 100% NO-3- N was advantageous to roots elongation and chlorophyll synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–537 · show in text ↑
e2

“its blade,stem girth,root activity and nitrate reductase activity of tobacco seedlings were worse than those of treatment of nutrient solution with 50% NO-3- N + 50% NH-4- N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution with 100% NO-3-N gave worse root activity and nitrate reductase activity than 50% NO-3-N plus 50% NH-4-N.

Treatment
100% NO-3- Ne1
Outcome
root activity and nitrate reductase activitye2
Direction
worsee2
Comparator
50% NO-3- N + 50% NH-4- Ne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment of nutrient solution with 100% NO-3- N was advantageous to roots elongation and chlorophyll synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–537 · show in text ↑
e2

“its blade,stem girth,root activity and nitrate reductase activity of tobacco seedlings were worse than those of treatment of nutrient solution with 50% NO-3- N + 50% NH-4- N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N concentration of 500 or 700 mg/L gave better agronomic traits and physiological indices than other treatments.

Treatment
N concentration of 500 mg / L or 700 mg / Le3
Outcome
agronomic traits and physiological indexe3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
others treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–128 · show in text ↑
e3

“The agronomic traits and physiological index of tobacco seedlings in treatment of N concentration of 500 mg / L or 700 mg / L were better than those in others treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed ligand nutrient solution gave better agronomic traits, chlorophyll content and root activity than ammonium nitrate solution.

Treatment
mixed ligand nutrient solution with ammonium hydrogenphosphate and NO-3- Ne4
Outcome
agronomic traits,chlorophyll content,roots activitye4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
nutrient solution with ammonium nitratee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–128 · show in text ↑
e4

“The agronomic traits,chlorophyll content,roots activity and NAR activity in treatment of mixed ligand nutrient solution with ammonium hydrogenphosphate and NO-3- N were better than those of nutrient solution with ammonium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed ligand nutrient solution gave better nitrate reductase (NAR) activity than ammonium nitrate solution.

Treatment
mixed ligand nutrient solution with ammonium hydrogenphosphate and NO-3- Ne4
Outcome
NAR activitye4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
nutrient solution with ammonium nitratee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–128 · show in text ↑
e4

“The agronomic traits,chlorophyll content,roots activity and NAR activity in treatment of mixed ligand nutrient solution with ammonium hydrogenphosphate and NO-3- N were better than those of nutrient solution with ammonium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal NO-3-N to NH-4-N ratio for tobacco seedlings in nutrient solution was 1:1.

Outcome
optimal ratio of NO-3- N and NH-4- Ne5
Value
1∶ 1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–128 · show in text ↑
e5

“the optimal ratio of NO-3- N and NH-4- N was 1∶ 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1172 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 56 positive, 17 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 154 positive, 28 negative or no effect

153 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.