Paper · 2010 · Jiangsu nongye xuebao

Effect of vacuum precooling and storage temperature on quality of spinach.

Jing Xie; Min Liu

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The quality changes of spinach stored at(2±1) ℃,(12±1) ℃,and(22±1) ℃,respectively,or stored at(2+1) ℃ with no vacuum precooling were studied.The results showed that spinach stored at(2±1) ℃ had good preservation quality,and vacuum precooling could increase the quality by inhibiting the soluble protein synthesis,chlorophyll decomposition and sensory quality decline.Vacuum cooling had no obvious effects on the weight loss rate and Vitamin C content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach stored at 2±1 ℃ had good preservation quality.

Treatment
stored at(2±1) ℃e0
Outcome
preservation qualitye0
Direction
goode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that spinach stored at(2±1) ℃ had good preservation quality,and vacuum precooling could increase the quality by inhibiting the soluble protein synthesis,chlorophyll decomposition and sensory quality decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum precooling increased spinach quality.

Treatment
vacuum precoolinge0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that spinach stored at(2±1) ℃ had good preservation quality,and vacuum precooling could increase the quality by inhibiting the soluble protein synthesis,chlorophyll decomposition and sensory quality decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum precooling inhibited spinach soluble protein synthesis.

Treatment
vacuum precoolinge0
Outcome
soluble protein synthesise0
Direction
inhibitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that spinach stored at(2±1) ℃ had good preservation quality,and vacuum precooling could increase the quality by inhibiting the soluble protein synthesis,chlorophyll decomposition and sensory quality decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum precooling inhibited spinach chlorophyll decomposition.

Treatment
vacuum precoolinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll decompositione0
Direction
inhibitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that spinach stored at(2±1) ℃ had good preservation quality,and vacuum precooling could increase the quality by inhibiting the soluble protein synthesis,chlorophyll decomposition and sensory quality decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum precooling inhibited spinach sensory quality decline.

Treatment
vacuum precoolinge0
Outcome
sensory quality declinee0
Direction
inhibitinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that spinach stored at(2±1) ℃ had good preservation quality,and vacuum precooling could increase the quality by inhibiting the soluble protein synthesis,chlorophyll decomposition and sensory quality decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum cooling had no obvious effects on spinach weight loss rate or Vitamin C content.

Treatment
Vacuum coolinge0
Outcome
weight loss rate and Vitamin C contente0
Direction
no obvious effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vacuum cooling had no obvious effects on the weight loss rate and Vitamin C content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of vacuum precooling and storage temperature on quality of spinach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.