Paper · 2014 · Guangdong nongye kexue

Effect of Different Topping Ways on Chemical Compositions in Upper Leaves of Flue-cured Tobacco

Guo Dong-ha

13
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In order to optimize the grade structure of flue-cured tobacco leaves,we researched the effects of different topping ways on the main chemical compositions( nicotine,reducing sugar,potassium,etc.) in upper leaves of tobacco. The results indicated that the complete topping( treatment 1) caused single-leaf weight to be overweight,nicotine content to be high,potassium content to be low,and sugar-nicotine ratio to be inharmonious. No topping( treatment 4) could reduce nicotine content and increase potassium content,but it led to the decrease in single-leaf weight and reducing sugar content as well as the inharmony of sugar-nitrogen ratio. Partial topping plus reserving 15 buds( treatment 3) increased single-leaf weight,and made sugar-nitrogen ratio harmonious; the nicotine content was lower and potassium content was higher in treatment 3 than those in treatment 4. Therefore,partial topping plus reserving 15 buds was a way to improve the usability of upper tobacco leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete topping made single-leaf weight overweight.

Treatment
complete toppinge0
Outcome
single-leaf weighte0
Direction
overweighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the complete topping( treatment 1) caused single-leaf weight to be overweight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete topping made nicotine content high.

Treatment
complete toppinge0
Outcome
nicotine contente0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the complete topping( treatment 1) caused single-leaf weight to be overweight,nicotine content to be high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete topping made potassium content low.

Treatment
complete toppinge0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the complete topping( treatment 1) caused single-leaf weight to be overweight,nicotine content to be high,potassium content to be low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete topping made the sugar-nicotine ratio inharmonious.

Treatment
complete toppinge0
Outcome
sugar-nicotine ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the complete topping( treatment 1) caused single-leaf weight to be overweight,nicotine content to be high,potassium content to be low,and sugar-nicotine ratio to be inharmonious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No topping reduced nicotine content and increased potassium content.

Treatment
No toppinge0
Outcome
nicotine contente0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“No topping( treatment 4) could reduce nicotine content and increase potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No topping increased potassium content.

Treatment
No toppinge0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“No topping( treatment 4) could reduce nicotine content and increase potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No topping decreased single-leaf weight and reducing sugar content.

Treatment
No toppinge1
Outcome
single-leaf weight and reducing sugar contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“it led to the decrease in single-leaf weight and reducing sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“No topping( treatment 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No topping made the sugar-nitrogen ratio inharmonious.

Treatment
No toppinge1
Outcome
inharmony of sugar-nitrogen ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the inharmony of sugar-nitrogen ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–641 · show in text ↑
e1

“No topping( treatment 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial topping with 15 buds increased single-leaf weight.

Treatment
Partial topping plus reserving 15 budse0
Outcome
single-leaf weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Partial topping plus reserving 15 buds( treatment 3) increased single-leaf weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial topping with 15 buds made the sugar-nitrogen ratio harmonious.

Treatment
Partial topping plus reserving 15 budse0
Outcome
sugar-nitrogen ratio harmoniouse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Partial topping plus reserving 15 buds( treatment 3) increased single-leaf weight,and made sugar-nitrogen ratio harmonious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial topping with 15 buds produced lower nicotine than no topping.

Treatment
Partial topping plus reserving 15 budse1
Outcome
nicotine contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
No toppinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the nicotine content was lower and potassium content was higher in treatment 3 than those in treatment 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“Partial topping plus reserving 15 buds( treatment 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–695 · show in text ↑
e2

“No topping( treatment 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial topping with 15 buds produced higher potassium than no topping.

Treatment
Partial topping plus reserving 15 budse1
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
No toppinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the nicotine content was lower and potassium content was higher in treatment 3 than those in treatment 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“Partial topping plus reserving 15 buds( treatment 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–695 · show in text ↑
e2

“No topping( treatment 4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–455 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended partial topping with 15 buds to improve upper-leaf usability.

Treatment
partial topping plus reserving 15 budse0
Outcome
improve the usability of upper tobacco leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“partial topping plus reserving 15 buds was a way to improve the usability of upper tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–980 · show in text ↑

pruning · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.