Paper · 2013 · Northern Horticulture

Fertilization Effect as Well as Optimize Fertilize of Controlled Release N Fertilizer on Grape in Xinjiang

Yi Liu

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking 8-year-old red globe grape as material,field experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of different amounts and mixture ratio of two controlled release of nitrogenous fertilizer and common urea on grape yield and quality.The results showed that nitrogen fertilizer especially 2 kinds of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased the yield of grapes.The nitrogen treatments had the range of increasing between 11.23% and 25.30% than the CK,grape yield and per ear weight,amount of nitrogen was positively correlated,per ear weight and yield of three kinds of nitrogen fertilizer varieties appear PCUSPCUPUCK,and nitrogen fertilizer agronomic efficiency obviously enhanced.While the grape quality and single grain weight showed negatively trend related to the grape yield;controlled release nitrogen fertilizer mixed with a certain amount of ordinary urea could further improve the yield of grapes,two treatments of adding 30% and 50% urea compare with single controlled release nitrogen fertilizer,rate of yield increase was respectively 7.37%,5.79%,with good application effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased grape yield, especially controlled-release types.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yield of grapese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizer especially 2 kinds of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased the yield of grapes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatments raised grape yield by 11.23%–25.30% versus CK.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
nitrogen treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasinge0
Value
11.23% and 25.30%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen treatments had the range of increasing between 11.23% and 25.30% than the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased the yield of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–387 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amount of nitrogen correlated positively with grape yield.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
amount of nitrogene0
Outcome
grape yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Verbatim

e0

“grape yield and per ear weight,amount of nitrogen was positively correlated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–553 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amount of nitrogen correlated positively with per ear weight.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
amount of nitrogene0
Outcome
per ear weighte0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Verbatim

e0

“grape yield and per ear weight,amount of nitrogen was positively correlated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–553 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three fertilizer types ranked PCU, SPCU, then PUCK for ear weight and yield as stated.

Taxon
Grapet0
Outcome
per ear weight and yielde0
Qualifier
PCUSPCUPUCKe0

Verbatim

e0

“per ear weight and yield of three kinds of nitrogen fertilizer varieties appear PCUSPCUPUCK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer agronomic efficiency improved.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizer agronomic efficiency obviously enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

grape quality was negatively related to grape yield.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
grape qualitye0
Direction
negatively trende0
Comparator
grape yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“grape quality and single grain weight showed negatively trend related to the grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–808 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

single grain weight was negatively related to grape yield.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
single grain weighte0
Direction
negatively trende0
Comparator
grape yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“grape quality and single grain weight showed negatively trend related to the grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release fertilizer mixed with ordinary urea further improved grape yield.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
controlled release nitrogen fertilizer mixed with a certain amount of ordinary ureae0
Outcome
yield of grapese0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“controlled release nitrogen fertilizer mixed with a certain amount of ordinary urea could further improve the yield of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 30% urea increased yield 7.37% versus controlled-release fertilizer alone.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
30%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.37%e0
Comparator
single controlled release nitrogen fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“two treatments of adding 30% and 50% urea compare with single controlled release nitrogen fertilizer,rate of yield increase was respectively 7.37%,5.79%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 50% urea increased yield 5.79% versus controlled-release fertilizer alone.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
50%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.79%e0
Comparator
single controlled release nitrogen fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“two treatments of adding 30% and 50% urea compare with single controlled release nitrogen fertilizer,rate of yield increase was respectively 7.37%,5.79%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · VitisResults differ

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.