Paper · 2008 · Anhui nongye kexue

Preliminary Exploration on the Application Effect of Biogas Manure on Maize Production

Gong Chuan-shu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The purpose of the research was to supply scientific basis for the utilization of biogas byproducts and the high-yield cultivation of corn.[Method] In the experiment of corn cultivation,3 treatments were set up as: rinsing soaking seeds without applying biogas liquid as A(CK),on based of biogas dregs mix nutrition soil after biogas liquid soaking seeds,without applying biogas liquid as B and with applying biogas liquid in seedling and heading stage as C.[Result] Compared with CK,both the treatments B and C could promote the growing process of corn and shortened the growth period of corn for 4 and 7d resp.;seed-soaking with biogas slurry could shorten the seedling emergence period of corn for 2 d;the plant height,stem thickness,ear height,ear thickness,ear weight,row number per ear,grain number per row and 1 000-seed weight in the treatment B increased 2.65%,0%,2.33%,8.77%,23.53%,12.50%,25.99% and 2.94% resp.and that in the treatment C increased 3.59%,4.17%,5.99%,8.77%,50.00%,12.50%,20.06% and 10.68% resp.The average plot yields in the treatments C and B reached 39.10 and 35.10 kg resp.,being 15.99% and 4.72% higher than CK resp.The yield in the treatment C was significantly higher than that in CK.[Conclusion] As biogas byproducts,biogas residues and slurry had some promoting effects on the germination,seedling emergence and high-yield cultivation of corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment B shortened corn growth period by 4 days versus CK.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
growth periode0
Direction
shortenede0
Value
4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the treatments B and C could promote the growing process of corn and shortened the growth period of corn for 4 and 7d resp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry seed soaking shortened corn seedling emergence by 2 days.

Treatment
seed-soaking with biogas slurrye0
Outcome
seedling emergence periode0
Direction
shortene0
Value
2 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed-soaking with biogas slurry could shorten the seedling emergence period of corn for 2 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment C had a 39.10 kg average plot yield, 15.99% above CK.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treatments Ce0
Outcome
average plot yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.99%e0
Qualifier
39.10e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average plot yields in the treatments C and B reached 39.10 and 35.10 kg resp.,being 15.99% and 4.72% higher than CK resp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment B had a 35.10 kg average plot yield, 4.72% above CK.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
average plot yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.72%e0
Qualifier
35.10 kge0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average plot yields in the treatments C and B reached 39.10 and 35.10 kg resp.,being 15.99% and 4.72% higher than CK resp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment C yield was significantly above CK.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treatment Ce0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield in the treatment C was significantly higher than that in CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

boron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 239 positive, 28 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.