Paper · 2001 · Acta Agriculturae Universitis Jiangxiensis

A Study on the Effect of Applying the Compound Fertilizer of Organic NPK from the Concretions of Papermaking Black-Liguid on Cotton

Zhou Yue-long

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper systematically studies the effect of the compound fertilizer of organic NPK from the concretions of papermaking black-liquid on cotton yield and quality. Applying the compound fertilizer can bring about relatively favorable result with the yields of unginned and ginned cotton respectively reaching 4749.15kg/hm 2 and 2063.55kg/hm 2. So it has almost the same effect as Shidazhuangl (with only 5.78%~3.97% yield loss), and it increases the yield by 17.43%~18.61% compared with Shidazhuang 2. The effect mainly lies in comparatively vigorous early growth of cotton plant, lower attachment position of fruit branch as well as more fruit branches and fruit nodes, which contributes to more bolls before hot summer days, earlier ripening of cotton and more reasonable ratio of “the three kind of boll”. Therefore, the cotton plant maintains steady growth and better fruitage in the middle stage with no premature senescence. Besides, the compound fertilizer has little effect on cotton quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic NPK fertilizer produced 4749.15kg/hm 2 unginned cotton yield.

Treatment
compound fertilizere1
Outcome
yields of unginnede1
Direction
favorablee1
Value
4749.15kg/hm 2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying the compound fertilizer can bring about relatively favorable result with the yields of unginned and ginned cotton respectively reaching 4749.15kg/hm 2 and 2063.55kg/hm 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic NPK fertilizer produced 2063.55kg/hm 2 ginned cotton yield.

Treatment
compound fertilizere2
Outcome
ginned cottone1
Direction
reachinge1
Value
2063.55kg/hm 2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“yields of unginned and ginned cotton respectively reaching 4749.15kg/hm 2 and 2063.55kg/hm 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–343 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applying the compound fertilizer can bring about relatively favorable result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield with the compound fertilizer was close to Shidazhuangl, with 5.78%~3.97% yield loss.

Treatment
compound fertilizere2
Outcome
yield losse1
Direction
losse1
Value
5.78%~3.97%e1
Comparator
Shidazhuangle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“it has almost the same effect as Shidazhuangl (with only 5.78%~3.97% yield loss)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–428 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applying the compound fertilizer can bring about relatively favorable result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The compound fertilizer increased cotton yield by 17.43%~18.61% versus Shidazhuang 2.

Treatment
compound fertilizere2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
17.43%~18.61%e1
Comparator
Shidazhuang 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“it increases the yield by 17.43%~18.61% compared with Shidazhuang 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–501 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applying the compound fertilizer can bring about relatively favorable result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer was associated with vigorous early cotton growth, lower fruit branch attachment, and more fruit branches and nodes.

Outcome
vigorous early growth of cotton plant, lower attachment position of fruit branch as well as more fruit branches and fruit nodese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton plant, lower attachment position of fruit branch as well as more fruit branches and fruit nodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–670 · show in text ↑
e1

“comparatively vigorous early growth of cotton plant, lower attachment position of fruit branch as well as more fruit branches and fruit nodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–670 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton formed more bolls before hot summer days and ripened earlier.

Outcome
more bolls before hot summer days, earlier ripening of cottone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“earlier ripening of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“more bolls before hot summer days, earlier ripening of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–754 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton maintained steady middle-stage growth and fruitage without premature senescence.

Outcome
steady growth and better fruitage in the middle stage with no premature senescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton plant maintains steady growth and better fruitage in the middle stage with no premature senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer had little effect on cotton quality.

Treatment
compound fertilizere0
Outcome
cotton qualitye0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the compound fertilizer has little effect on cotton quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1000 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.