Paper · 2010 · Zhongguo yancao xuebao

Effects of appling suckering agent and growth regulator on potassium and nicotine content in flue-cured tobacco leaves

Yang Cheng

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of combined application of suckering agent and growth regulator on quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves were studied through pot,micro-plot,and plot experiments.Results showed that in plot experiment,potassium content of upper and lower leaves was increased significantly by applying suckering agent after decapitation before daubing growth regulator,while nicotine content of middle and lower leaves was decreased significantly.In pot experiment,potassium content of middle and lower leaves was increased significantly by application suckering agent after decapitation and then daubing growth regulator either immediately or one day or two days later,while nicotine content of upper,middle,and lower leaves were decreased significantly.The best effect was obtained in treatment of daubing growth regulator immediately or one day later.In micro-plot experiment,potassium content of tobacco leaves was increased and nicotine content was decreased significantly in all treatments of suckering agent application methods(showering or daubing),and daubing was better than showering.Potassium and nicotine content between tobacco varieties were different,but the change was very similar,and there were significant negative correlations between potassium and nicotine content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot potassium increased in upper and lower leaves after suckering agent followed by growth regulator.

Treatment
applying suckering agent after decapitation before daubing growth regulatore0
Outcome
potassium content of upper and lower leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content of upper and lower leaves was increased significantly by applying suckering agent after decapitation before daubing growth regulator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot nicotine decreased in middle and lower leaves.

Outcome
nicotine content of middle and lower leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nicotine content of middle and lower leaves was decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot potassium increased in middle and lower leaves with delayed or immediate growth regulator.

Treatment
application suckering agent after decapitation and then daubing growth regulator either immediately or one day or two days latere0
Outcome
potassium content of middle and lower leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content of middle and lower leaves was increased significantly by application suckering agent after decapitation and then daubing growth regulator either immediately or one day or two days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot nicotine decreased in upper, middle, and lower leaves.

Outcome
nicotine content of upper,middle,and lower leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nicotine content of upper,middle,and lower leaves were decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immediate or one-day-later growth regulator application gave the best effect.

Outcome
best effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best effect was obtained in treatment of daubing growth regulator immediately or one day later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microplot potassium increased under all suckering application methods.

Treatment
suckering agent application methods(showering or daubing)e0
Outcome
potassium content of tobacco leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content of tobacco leaves was increased and nicotine content was decreased significantly in all treatments of suckering agent application methods(showering or daubing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microplot nicotine decreased under all suckering application methods.

Treatment
suckering agent application methods(showering or daubing)e0
Outcome
nicotine contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content of tobacco leaves was increased and nicotine content was decreased significantly in all treatments of suckering agent application methods(showering or daubing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daubing was better than showering.

Outcome
daubing was better than showeringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“daubing was better than showering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed in potassium and nicotine content.

Outcome
Potassium and nicotine contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium and nicotine content between tobacco varieties were different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and nicotine content were negatively correlated.

Compound
potassiume0
Outcome
potassium and nicotine contente0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant negative correlations between potassium and nicotine content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–118 · show in text ↑

pruning · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

class · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.