Abstract
The effect of magnesium on litchi and citrus fruit are studied,the field trial results show the following: in Mg deficient soils,adequate Mg input will give an increase in yield of 11.4%～33.3% with economic benefit income of 0.8%～37.5%;in Mg S deficient soils,magnesium potash sulfate is better than magnesium chloride for litchi.Adequate magnesium is good to the yield and quality of the product for citrus fruits,compared with no Mg treatment.Magnesium sulfate gives the best response to yield and quality,and magnesium carbonate ranks the second for Shatian pomelo,however their economic benefits are lower than magnesium potash sulfate for high costs.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Adequate magnesium input raised fruit yield by 11.4%～33.3% on Mg-deficient soils.
- Treatment
- adequate Mg inpute0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 11.4%～33.3%e0
- Setting
- Mg deficient soilse0
Citrus
LitchiNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in Mg deficient soils,adequate Mg input will give an increase in yield of 11.4%～33.3%”
t0“litchi and citrus”
Claim · model-written summary
Adequate magnesium input raised economic benefit income by 0.8%～37.5%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“adequate Mg input will give an increase in yield of 11.4%～33.3% with economic benefit income of 0.8%～37.5%”
t0“litchi and citrus”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium potash sulfate performed better than magnesium chloride for litchi on Mg- and S-deficient soil.
- Treatment
- magnesium potash sulfatee0
- Outcome
- bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- magnesium chloridee0
- Setting
- Mg S deficient soilse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in Mg S deficient soils,magnesium potash sulfate is better than magnesium chloride for litchi.”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium improved citrus yield relative to no Mg.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adequate magnesium is good to the yield and quality of the product for citrus fruits,compared with no Mg treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium improved citrus fruit quality relative to no Mg.
- Treatment
- Adequate magnesiume0
- Outcome
- quality of the producte0
- Direction
- goode0
- Comparator
- no Mg treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Adequate magnesium is good to the yield and quality of the product for citrus fruits,compared with no Mg treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium sulfate gave the best Shatian pomelo yield and quality response.
Verbatim
e0“Magnesium sulfate gives the best response to yield and quality,and magnesium carbonate ranks the second for Shatian pomelo”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium carbonate ranked second for Shatian pomelo yield and quality.
Verbatim
e0“Magnesium sulfate gives the best response to yield and quality,and magnesium carbonate ranks the second for Shatian pomelo”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium sulfate and carbonate had lower economic benefits than magnesium potash sulfate because of high costs.
Verbatim
e0“Magnesium sulfate gives the best response to yield and quality,and magnesium carbonate ranks the second for Shatian pomelo,however their economic benefits are lower than magnesium potash sulfate for high costs.”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · yield · CitrusResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.