Abstract
The effects of deep cultivation\|root cutting on nitrogen distribution and utilization and yield in dry land wheat have been studied in field.The results showed that the best effect obtained from 4 treatments by deep cultivation\|root cutting in before winter stage,more nitrogen absorbed was distributed in kernel and less in root system.The utilization ratio and loss ratio of fertilizer nitrogen increased,the remainder ratio in soil and recovery ratio of fertilizer nitrogen decreased,and the grain yield increased.However,the opposite effects of the deep cultivation\|root cutting was found in before winter stage and starter stage and in control.So the technology of deep cultivation\|root cutting in before winter stage should be used in dry land for high yield wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Before-winter deep cultivation and root cutting distributed more absorbed nitrogen to kernels and less to roots.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- deep cultivation\|root cutting in before winter stagee0
- Outcome
- nitrogen absorbed was distributed in kernel and less in root systeme0
- Direction
- moree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by deep cultivation\|root cutting in before winter stage,more nitrogen absorbed was distributed in kernel and less in root system.”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep cultivation and root cutting increased fertilizer nitrogen utilization and loss ratios.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- DEEP CULTIVATION\|ROOT CUTTINGt1
- Outcome
- utilization ratio and loss ratio of fertilizer nitrogene0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The utilization ratio and loss ratio of fertilizer nitrogen increased”
t0“WHEAT”
t1“DEEP CULTIVATION\|ROOT CUTTING”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep cultivation and root cutting decreased the soil remainder and fertilizer nitrogen recovery ratios.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- DEEP CULTIVATION\|ROOT CUTTINGt1
- Outcome
- remainder ratio in soil and recovery ratio of fertilizer nitrogene0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the remainder ratio in soil and recovery ratio of fertilizer nitrogen decreased”
t0“WHEAT”
t1“DEEP CULTIVATION\|ROOT CUTTING”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep cultivation and root cutting increased wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- DEEP CULTIVATION\|ROOT CUTTINGt1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the grain yield increased”
t0“WHEAT”
t1“DEEP CULTIVATION\|ROOT CUTTING”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend before-winter deep cultivation and root cutting for high-yield dryland wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- deep cultivation\|root cutting in before winter stage should be usede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the technology of deep cultivation\|root cutting in before winter stage should be used in dry land for high yield wheat.”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.