Paper · 2009 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Effect of ecologically-based weed management strategies on weed community and diversity in hilly tea plantations

Xiang Zuo

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ecologically controlling weeds does not only reduce consumption of soil water and nutrient,but also avoid or reduce application of chemical herbicides.Two ecologically-based weed management strategies based on pre-evaluation and competition of niche,straw mulching and white clover intercropping,were conducted in hilly tea plantations in 2005 and 2006,with clean tillage as the CK.Characteristics of weed community,including weed abundance,dominance,evenness,biomass and mean height were investigated via multi-sampling in small plot and the effects of two ecologically-based weed management strategies were compared with the clean tillage.About 16 families and 31 species of weeds are identified in the study.In April,the dominant weed species are those growing slowing with low biomass and lower than 30 cm.In July and September,the abundance (Pi) of malignant weed in CK respectively reaches 0.788 and 0.759,while that in straw mulching treatment is respectively 0.256 and 0.420,and a lower malignant weed occurrence frequency is found in white clover intercropping treatment with Pi0.050.Weed richness,species diversity and evenness under straw mulching treatment are all higher than those under CK,though the dominant concentration index is lower than that of CK in spring,summer and autumn.Total number,biomass in spring,summer and autumn,and mean weed height in summer and autumn under white clover intercropping treatment are lower than those under the control.The two ecologically-based treatments have a favorable effect on weed control than the clean tillage.It therefore implies that white clover intercropping and straw mulching are effective ecological weed control measures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixteen weed families and 31 weed species were identified in the tea plantations.

Taxon
teat0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
families and 31 species of weedse0
Value
16 families and 31 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“About 16 families and 31 species of weeds are identified in the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In April, dominant weeds grew slowly, had low biomass and were under 30 cm.

Taxon
teat0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
dominant weed speciese0
Value
lower than 30 cme0
Qualifier
In Aprile0

Verbatim

e0

“In April,the dominant weed species are those growing slowing with low biomass and lower than 30 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In July, malignant weed abundance was 0.256 with straw mulch versus 0.788 under clean tillage.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
straw mulching treatmente0
Interactor
malignant weede0weed
Outcome
abundance (Pi) of malignant weede0
Value
0.256e0
Qualifier
In Julye0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In July and September,the abundance (Pi) of malignant weed in CK respectively reaches 0.788 and 0.759,while that in straw mulching treatment is respectively 0.256 and 0.420”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In September, malignant weed abundance was 0.420 with straw mulch versus 0.759 under clean tillage.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
straw mulching treatmente0
Interactor
malignant weede0weed
Outcome
abundance (Pi) of malignant weede0
Value
0.420e0
Qualifier
Septembere0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In July and September,the abundance (Pi) of malignant weed in CK respectively reaches 0.788 and 0.759,while that in straw mulching treatment is respectively 0.256 and 0.420”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover intercropping had lower malignant weed occurrence frequency.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
white clover intercropping treatmente0
Interactor
malignant weede0weed
Outcome
malignant weed occurrence frequencye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
Pi0.050e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a lower malignant weed occurrence frequency is found in white clover intercropping treatment with Pi0.050.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch increased weed richness, species diversity and evenness compared with clean tillage.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
straw mulching treatmente0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed richness,species diversity and evennesse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Weed richness,species diversity and evenness under straw mulching treatment are all higher than those under CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch lowered the weed dominant concentration index relative to clean tillage across seasons.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
straw mulching treatmente0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
dominant concentration indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
spring,summer and autumne0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“Weed richness,species diversity and evenness under straw mulching treatment are all higher than those under CK,though the dominant concentration index is lower than that of CK in spring,summer and autumn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover intercropping lowered total weed number relative to clean tillage.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
white clover intercropping treatmente0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
Total numbere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Total number,biomass in spring,summer and autumn,and mean weed height in summer and autumn under white clover intercropping treatment are lower than those under the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed management strategies on weed community and diversity in hilly tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover intercropping lowered weed biomass in spring, summer and autumn.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
white clover intercropping treatmente0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
spring,summer and autumne0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Total number,biomass in spring,summer and autumn,and mean weed height in summer and autumn under white clover intercropping treatment are lower than those under the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed management strategies on weed community and diversity in hilly tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White clover intercropping lowered mean weed height in summer and autumn.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
white clover intercropping treatmente0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
mean weed heighte0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
summer and autumne0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Total number,biomass in spring,summer and autumn,and mean weed height in summer and autumn under white clover intercropping treatment are lower than those under the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed management strategies on weed community and diversity in hilly tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that white clover intercropping is an effective ecological weed control measure.

Taxon
teat0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
white clover intercroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“white clover intercropping and straw mulching are effective ecological weed control measures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1690 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that straw mulching is an effective ecological weed control measure.

Taxon
teat0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
straw mulchinge0

Verbatim

e0

“white clover intercropping and straw mulching are effective ecological weed control measures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1690 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑

Trifolium repens · weed · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

organic · weed · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · weed · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.