Paper · 2006 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Ecological effects of intercropping white clover on tea plantation in a subtropical hilly region

Song Tong; Wang Jiu

20
claims
49
verbatim quotes
16
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tea(Camellia sinensis) is a type of the important cash crops and widely cultivated in the hilly areas of the subtropical region of south China.In order to improve the yield and quality of tea in this region,the ecological effects of intercropping white clovers(Trifolium repens) were investigated in an field experiments set up in Dongxishan tea plantation in Baili Chalang(113°19′E,28°33′N at an elevation of 135m),Changsha County,Hunan.Data obtained demonstrated that the soil porosity and the content of organic matter,total N,water-soluble N,and available K increased 4.4%,24.1%,33.3%,30.3% and 16.1%,respectively,in the treatment intercropped with white clovers between the tea rows(a.0.8),compared to those values measured in the control(the rows remained bare).However,the content of total K and available P decreased by 10.4% and 9.2% in the former treatment,presumably due to the uptakes of white clover.During the season when spring tea leaves produced(from April to June),and hot summer(July to August) and drought autumn(September to October) seasons when tea plants often damaged due to water shortage,water content in 0~20cm soil layer increased significantly by intercropping white clovers.In treatment intercropped with white clovers,soil temperature increased in winter and decreased in summer.Thus,intercropping white clovers protected tea plants from both of damages caused by coldness(0℃) and hotness(35℃).In the treatment intercropped with white clovers,weeds were largely preserved,as their species,densities and total biomass decreased by 18.5%,61.8%,and 87.5%;and the populations of Ectropis griseescens,Empoasca vitis and Toxoptera aurantii,which are the three types of main pests for tea,decreased by 80.00%,81.94% and 31.40%,respectively;compared those in the control.However,the populations of araneras,coleopteras,and hymenopteras,which are the main natural enemies of the pests,increased by 84%,129%,110%,respectively;and the population and total biomass of earthworms increased by 4.15 ind./m~2 and 8.32 g/m~2 in this treatment.In the treatment intercropped with white clovers,the total yield of tea increased by 32.6% and the ratio of polyphenol to amino acid(TP/FAA) of spring tea and autumn tea decreased by 17.10% and 30.90%,compared to those values for the control.In conclusion,intercropping white clovers in tea plantations have multi-ecological function in improving soil properties,water conditions and temperature environment,controlling weeds and pests,and improving the yield and qualities of tea,and thus can be applied as a useful measure for tea cultivation in the hilly areas of the subtropical region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased soil porosity by 4.4%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropped with white cloverse1
Outcome
soil porositye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.4%e1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil porosity and the content of organic matter,total N,water-soluble N,and available K increased 4.4%,24.1%,33.3%,30.3% and 16.1%,respectively,in the treatment intercropped with white clovers between the tea rows(a.0.8),compared to those values measured in the control(the rows remained bare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased soil organic matter by 24.1%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropped with white cloverse1
Outcome
organic mattere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
24.1%e1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil porosity and the content of organic matter,total N,water-soluble N,and available K increased 4.4%,24.1%,33.3%,30.3% and 16.1%,respectively,in the treatment intercropped with white clovers between the tea rows(a.0.8),compared to those values measured in the control(the rows remained bare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased total soil N by 33.3%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropped with white cloverse1
Outcome
total Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
33.3%e1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil porosity and the content of organic matter,total N,water-soluble N,and available K increased 4.4%,24.1%,33.3%,30.3% and 16.1%,respectively,in the treatment intercropped with white clovers between the tea rows(a.0.8),compared to those values measured in the control(the rows remained bare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased water-soluble N by 30.3%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropped with white cloverse1
Outcome
water-soluble Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
30.3%e1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil porosity and the content of organic matter,total N,water-soluble N,and available K increased 4.4%,24.1%,33.3%,30.3% and 16.1%,respectively,in the treatment intercropped with white clovers between the tea rows(a.0.8),compared to those values measured in the control(the rows remained bare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased available K by 16.1%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropped with white cloverse1
Outcome
available Ke1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.1%e1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil porosity and the content of organic matter,total N,water-soluble N,and available K increased 4.4%,24.1%,33.3%,30.3% and 16.1%,respectively,in the treatment intercropped with white clovers between the tea rows(a.0.8),compared to those values measured in the control(the rows remained bare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased total soil K by 10.4%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
former treatmente1
Outcome
total Ke1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
10.4%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of total K and available P decreased by 10.4% and 9.2% in the former treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased available soil P by 9.2%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
former treatmente1
Outcome
available Pe1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
9.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of total K and available P decreased by 10.4% and 9.2% in the former treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover intercropping significantly increased soil water at 0–20 cm during spring, summer and autumn.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropping white cloverse1
Outcome
water content in 0~20cm soil layere1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“water content in 0~20cm soil layer increased significantly by intercropping white clovers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover intercropping increased winter soil temperature.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropped with white cloverse1
Outcome
soil temperaturee1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
wintere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment intercropped with white clovers,soil temperature increased in winter and decreased in summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover intercropping decreased summer soil temperature.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
intercropped with white cloverse1
Outcome
soil temperaturee1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
summere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment intercropped with white clovers,soil temperature increased in winter and decreased in summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping protected tea from cold and heat damage.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
intercropping white cloverse1
Outcome
damages caused by coldness(0℃) and hotness(35℃)e1
Direction
protectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping white clovers protected tea plants from both of damages caused by coldness(0℃) and hotness(35℃)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed species, density and biomass decreased by 18.5%, 61.8% and 87.5%, respectively.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weedse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
18.5%,61.8%,and 87.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds were largely preserved,as their species,densities and total biomass decreased by 18.5%,61.8%,and 87.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ectropis griseescens populations decreased 80.00%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Interactor
Ectropis griseescense1pest
Outcome
populations of Ectropis griseescense1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
80.00%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the populations of Ectropis griseescens,Empoasca vitis and Toxoptera aurantii,which are the three types of main pests for tea,decreased by 80.00%,81.94% and 31.40%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Empoasca vitis populations decreased 81.94%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Interactor
Empoasca vitisEmpoasca vitise1pest
Outcome
populationse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
81.94%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Empoasca vitis
Empoasca vitis · InteractorCybernadette · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the populations of Ectropis griseescens,Empoasca vitis and Toxoptera aurantii,which are the three types of main pests for tea,decreased by 80.00%,81.94% and 31.40%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxoptera aurantii populations decreased 31.40%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Interactor
Toxoptera aurantiiAphis aurantiie1pest
Outcome
populationse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
31.40%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aphis aurantii
Aphis aurantii · InteractorJesse Rorabaugh · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the populations of Ectropis griseescens,Empoasca vitis and Toxoptera aurantii,which are the three types of main pests for tea,decreased by 80.00%,81.94% and 31.40%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aranera, coleoptera and hymenoptera natural enemies increased by 84%, 129% and 110%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Interactor
aranerase1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
populations of araneras,coleopteras,and hymenopterase1
Direction
increasede1
Value
84%,129%,110%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the populations of araneras,coleopteras,and hymenopteras,which are the main natural enemies of the pests,increased by 84%,129%,110%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1947 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworm population increased by 4.15 individuals per square meter.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae1other
Outcome
populatione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.15 ind./m~2e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the population and total biomass of earthworms increased by 4.15 ind./m~2 and 8.32 g/m~2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2040 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earthworm biomass increased by 8.32 grams per square meter.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Interactor
earthwormsCrassiclitellatae1other
Outcome
total biomass of earthwormse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.32 g/m~2e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the population and total biomass of earthworms increased by 4.15 ind./m~2 and 8.32 g/m~2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2040 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea yield increased by 32.6% under intercropping.

Taxon
teae1
Treatment
white clovert0
Outcome
total yield of teae1
Direction
increasede1
Value
32.6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total yield of tea increased by 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2149 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced tea polyphenol to amino acid ratio in spring by 17.10% and autumn by 30.90%.

Taxon
Teae0
Treatment
white clovert0
Outcome
ratio of polyphenol to amino acid(TP/FAA)e1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
17.10% and 30.90%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Tea(Camellia sinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the ratio of polyphenol to amino acid(TP/FAA) of spring tea and autumn tea decreased by 17.10% and 30.90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2154–2259 · show in text ↑
t0

“intercropping white clover on tea plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑

Trifolium repens · yield · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trifolium repens · weed · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · soil: physics · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.