Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Intercropping Walnut and Tea: Effects on Soil Nutrients, Enzyme Activity, and Microbial Communities

Yong-Chao Bai; Bao-Xin Li; Chun-Yong Xu; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
74
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The practice of intercropping, which involves growing more than one crop simultaneously during the same growing season, is becoming more important for increasing soil quality, land-use efficiency, and subsequently crop productivity. The present study examined changes in soil physicochemical properties, enzymatic activity, and microbial community composition when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest and compared with a walnut and tea monocropping system. The results showed that walnut–tea intercropping improved the soil nutrient profile and enzymatic activity. The soil available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), organic matter (OM) content, and sucrase activity were significantly boosted in intercropped walnut and tea than in monocropping forests. The interaction between crops further increased bacterial and fungal diversity when compared to monoculture tea forests. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chlamydiae, Rozellomycota, and Zoopagomycota were found in greater abundance in an intercropping pattern than in monoculture walnut and tea forest plantations. The walnut–tea intercropping system also markedly impacted the abundance of several bacterial and fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs), which were previously shown to support nutrient cycling, prevent diseases, and ameliorate abiotic stress. The results of this study suggest that intercropping walnut with tea increased host fitness and growth by positively influencing soil microbial populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping walnut with tea significantly boosted soil available N, P and K relative to monocropping.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensise0
Treatment
intercropped walnut and teae1
Outcome
soil available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK)e1
Direction
boostede1
Comparator
monocropping forestse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–456 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), organic matter (OM) content, and sucrase activity were significantly boosted in intercropped walnut and tea than in monocropping forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping walnut with tea significantly boosted organic matter content and sucrase activity relative to monocropping.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensise0
Treatment
intercropped walnut and teae1
Outcome
organic matter (OM) content, and sucrase activitye1
Direction
boostede1
Comparator
monocropping forestse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–456 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), organic matter (OM) content, and sucrase activity were significantly boosted in intercropped walnut and tea than in monocropping forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between crops increased bacterial and fungal diversity compared with monoculture tea forests.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensise0
Treatment
The interaction between cropse2
Outcome
bacterial and fungal diversitye2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
monoculture tea forestse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–456 · show in text ↑
e2

“The interaction between crops further increased bacterial and fungal diversity when compared to monoculture tea forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were found in greater abundance under intercropping than in monoculture walnut and tea forest plantations.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensise0
Treatment
an intercropping patterne3
Outcome
abundancee3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutese3
Comparator
monoculture walnut and tea forest plantationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–456 · show in text ↑
e3

“Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chlamydiae, Rozellomycota, and Zoopagomycota were found in greater abundance in an intercropping pattern than in monoculture walnut and tea forest plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlamydiae, Rozellomycota and Zoopagomycota were found in greater abundance under intercropping than in monoculture walnut and tea forest plantations.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensise0
Treatment
an intercropping patterne3
Outcome
abundancee3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
Chlamydiae, Rozellomycota, and Zoopagomycotae3
Comparator
monoculture walnut and tea forest plantationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–456 · show in text ↑
e3

“Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chlamydiae, Rozellomycota, and Zoopagomycota were found in greater abundance in an intercropping pattern than in monoculture walnut and tea forest plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The walnut–tea intercropping system markedly impacted the abundance of several bacterial and fungal OTUs; the direction is not stated.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensise0
Treatment
walnut–tea intercropping systeme4
Outcome
the abundance of several bacterial and fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs)e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–456 · show in text ↑
e4

“The walnut–tea intercropping system also markedly impacted the abundance of several bacterial and fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1309 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping walnut with tea increased host fitness and growth, the authors suggest, by positively influencing soil microbial populations.

Taxon
Juglans spp.Juglanse0
Treatment
intercropping walnut with teae5
Outcome
host fitness and growthe5
Qualifier
by positively influencing soil microbial populationse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juglans
Juglans · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when walnut ( Juglans spp.) was intercropped with tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) plants in a forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–456 · show in text ↑
e5

“intercropping walnut with tea increased host fitness and growth by positively influencing soil microbial populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1572 · show in text ↑

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · physiology: enzyme activity · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.