Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Different changes of bacterial diversity and soil metabolites in tea plants-legume intercropping systems

Shuangshuang Wang; Xiaojia Zhang; Xiaojiang Li; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
39
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

As an essential agroforestry, intercropping legumes can improve the physical, chemical, and biological fertility of the soil in tea plantations. However, the effects of intercropping different legume species on soil properties, bacterial communities, and metabolites remain elusive. In this study, the 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm soils of three planting patterns (T1: tea plants/mung bean intercropping, T2: tea plants/adzuki bean intercropping, T3: tea plants/mung bean and adzuki bean intercropping) were sampled to explore the diversity of the bacterial community and soil metabolites. The findings showed that, as compared to monocropping, intercropping systems had greater concentrations of organic matter (OM) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Notably, pH values were significantly lower, and soil nutrients increased in intercropping systems compared with monoculture in 20-40 cm soils, especially in T3. In addition, intercropping resulted in an increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria but a decreased relative abundance of Actinobacteria . 4-methyl-Tetradecane, acetamide, and diethyl carbamic acid were key metabolites mediating the root–microbe interactions, especially in tea plants/adzuki intercropping and tea plants/mung bean, adzuki bean mixed intercropping soils. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that arabinofuranose, abundant in tea plants and adzuki bean intercropping soils, showed the most remarkable correlation with the soil bacterial taxa. Our findings demonstrate that intercropping with adzuki beans is better at enhancing the diversity of soil bacteria and soil metabolites and is more weed-suppressing than other tea plants/legume intercropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume intercropping increased soil organic matter compared with tea monocropping.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
organic matter (OM)e0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“as compared to monocropping, intercropping systems had greater concentrations of organic matter (OM) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume intercropping increased dissolved organic carbon compared with tea monocropping.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
dissolved organic carbon (DOC)e0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“as compared to monocropping, intercropping systems had greater concentrations of organic matter (OM) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly lowered soil pH in 20-40 cm soil compared with monoculture.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
pH valuese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
20-40 cm soilse0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“pH values were significantly lower, and soil nutrients increased in intercropping systems compared with monoculture in 20-40 cm soils, especially in T3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased nutrients in 20-40 cm soil, particularly under T3.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Outcome
soil nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
20-40 cm soils, especially in T3e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“pH values were significantly lower, and soil nutrients increased in intercropping systems compared with monoculture in 20-40 cm soils, especially in T3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“T3: tea plants/mung bean and adzuki bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Interactor
ProteobacteriaPseudomonadotae0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of Proteobacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping resulted in an increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased relative abundance of Actinobacteria.

Taxon
tea plantst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Interactor
ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of Actinobacteriae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping resulted in an increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria but a decreased relative abundance of Actinobacteria .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–75 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

4-methyl-Tetradecane, acetamide and diethyl carbamic acid were identified as key root microbe interaction metabolites.

Taxon
tea plantse0
Compound
4-methyl-Tetradecane, acetamide, and diethyl carbamic acide0
Outcome
key metabolites mediating the root–microbe interactionse0
Qualifier
especially in tea plants/adzuki intercropping and tea plants/mung bean, adzuki bean mixed intercropping soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“4-methyl-Tetradecane, acetamide, and diethyl carbamic acid were key metabolites mediating the root–microbe interactions, especially in tea plants/adzuki intercropping and tea plants/mung bean, adzuki bean mixed intercropping soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1282 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arabinofuranose showed the strongest correlation with soil bacterial taxa in tea and adzuki bean intercrop soil.

Taxon
tea plantse0
Treatment
adzuki bean intercroppinge0
Compound
arabinofuranosee0
Outcome
correlation with the soil bacterial taxae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“arabinofuranose, abundant in tea plants and adzuki bean intercropping soils, showed the most remarkable correlation with the soil bacterial taxa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adzuki bean intercropping was judged best for enhancing soil bacterial diversity.

Taxon
tea plantse0
Treatment
intercropping with adzuki beanse0
Outcome
diversity of soil bacteriae0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other tea plants/legume intercropping systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with adzuki beans is better at enhancing the diversity of soil bacteria and soil metabolites and is more weed-suppressing than other tea plants/legume intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adzuki bean intercropping was judged best for enhancing soil metabolite diversity.

Taxon
tea plantse0
Treatment
intercropping with adzuki beanse0
Outcome
soil metabolitese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other tea plants/legume intercropping systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with adzuki beans is better at enhancing the diversity of soil bacteria and soil metabolites and is more weed-suppressing than other tea plants/legume intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adzuki bean intercropping suppressed weeds more than other tea legume intercrops.

Taxon
tea plantse0
Treatment
intercropping with adzuki beanse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed-suppressinge0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other tea plants/legume intercropping systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with adzuki beans is better at enhancing the diversity of soil bacteria and soil metabolites and is more weed-suppressing than other tea plants/legume intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1689 · show in text ↑

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · weed · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · ecology: diversity · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.