Paper · 2010 · Kunchong zhishi

Promoting effect of intercropping on insect diversity in Chinese plum-tea or medical dogwood-tea orchestnut-tea intercrop plantations

Qi Zhang

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of intercropping on insect community diversity and community structure were investigated in plantations of Chinese plum-tea,medical dogwood-tea or chestnut-tea.Within 6 intercropped plantations,the richness and abundance of insects,araneids and mites were investigated at monthly intervals from January 2007 to January 2009.The results show that: ① total species richness and diversity indices were markedly greater in intercropped plantations compared to the control plantation,and the abundance of natural enemies of plant pests and the ratio of beneficial to harmful organisms was slightly larger.② the effect of intercropping on total abundance was not obvious.We conclude that intercropping increases insect diversity in tea plantations to some extent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total species richness and diversity indices were markedly greater in intercropped plantations than in the control plantation.

Taxon
teae4
Treatment
intercropped plantationse1
Outcome
total species richness and diversity indicese1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
control plantatione1

Verbatim

e1

“total species richness and diversity indices were markedly greater in intercropped plantations compared to the control plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–490 · show in text ↑
e4

“intercropping increases insect diversity in tea plantations to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abundance of natural enemies of plant pests and the ratio of beneficial to harmful organisms were slightly larger in intercropped plantations than in the control plantation.

Taxon
teae4
Treatment
intercropped plantationse1
Interactor
natural enemiese2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
abundance of natural enemies of plant pests and the ratio of beneficial to harmful organismse2
Direction
slightly largere2
Comparator
control plantatione1

Verbatim

e1

“total species richness and diversity indices were markedly greater in intercropped plantations compared to the control plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–490 · show in text ↑
e2

“the abundance of natural enemies of plant pests and the ratio of beneficial to harmful organisms was slightly larger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–611 · show in text ↑
e4

“intercropping increases insect diversity in tea plantations to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of intercropping on total abundance of insects was not obvious.

Taxon
teae4
Treatment
intercroppinge3
Outcome
total abundancee3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“the effect of intercropping on total abundance was not obvious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–676 · show in text ↑
e4

“intercropping increases insect diversity in tea plantations to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–768 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · ecology: diversity · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.