Paper · 2023 · Pest Management Science

Intercropped Flemingia macrophylla successfully traps tea aphid (Toxoptera aurantia) and alters associated networks to enhance tea quality

Jie Gao; Jianwei Tang; Sen Zhang; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The tea aphid, Toxoptera aurantia is a destructive pest causing severe damage to the quality and yield of tea, Camellia sinensis. Relying on chemical insecticides to control this pest causes adverse ecological and economic consequences. Trap plants are an eco-friendly alternative strategy to mitigate pest damage on focal plants by attracting target insects and natural enemies. Yet, the utilization of trap plants in tea plantations remains limited. Besides, the effects of the trap plant on the tea aphid-ant-predator community and tea quality and yield are unknown. RESULTS: Intercropped Flemingia macrophylla successfully trapped tea aphids and enhanced the complexity of aphid-ant-predator networks over three consecutive years compared to monoculture management. Moreover, F. macrophylla significantly increased the abundance of natural predators by 3100% and species richness by 57%. The increasing predators suppressed the aphid population and hampered its spillover to neighbouring tea plants. Consequently, F. macrophylla improved tea quality by an 8% increase in soluble sugar and a 26% reduction in polyphenols to amino acids ratio. CONCLUSION: The study illustrated that F. macrophylla is a suitable trap crop for tea aphid control in tea plantations. This legume increases species nodes and strengthens multiple connections in aphid-associated communities through its cascade effects, improving tea quality. These findings shed light on the potential application of trap plants in tea plantations as an efficient integrated pest management (IPM) strategy. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped Flemingia macrophylla trapped tea aphids over three years.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Intercropped Flemingia macrophyllae0
Interactor
tea aphidse0pest
Outcome
trapped tea aphidse0
Direction
successfully trappede0
Comparator
monoculture managemente0

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropped Flemingia macrophylla successfully trapped tea aphids and enhanced the complexity of aphid-ant-predator networks over three consecutive years compared to monoculture management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea aphid (Toxoptera aurantia) and alters associated networks to enhance tea quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flemingia intercropping enhanced aphid-ant-predator network complexity over three years.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Intercropped Flemingia macrophyllae0
Interactor
tea aphidse0pest
Outcome
complexity of aphid-ant-predator networkse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
monoculture managemente0

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropped Flemingia macrophylla successfully trapped tea aphids and enhanced the complexity of aphid-ant-predator networks over three consecutive years compared to monoculture management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. macrophylla increased natural predator abundance by 3100%.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
F. macrophyllae0
Outcome
abundance of natural predatorse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“F. macrophylla significantly increased the abundance of natural predators by 3100% and species richness by 57%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. macrophylla increased natural predator species richness by 57%.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
F. macrophyllae0
Outcome
species richnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“F. macrophylla significantly increased the abundance of natural predators by 3100% and species richness by 57%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–138 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More predators suppressed tea aphid populations.

Taxon
tea plantse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
increasing predatorse0

Verbatim

e0

“The increasing predators suppressed the aphid population and hampered its spillover to neighbouring tea plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1015 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More predators hampered aphid spillover to neighboring tea plants.

Taxon
tea plantse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
its spillover to neighbouring tea plantse0
Direction
hamperede0
Qualifier
increasing predatorse0

Verbatim

e0

“The increasing predators suppressed the aphid population and hampered its spillover to neighbouring tea plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. macrophylla raised tea soluble sugar by 8%.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
F. macrophyllae0
Outcome
soluble sugare0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“F. macrophylla improved tea quality by an 8% increase in soluble sugar and a 26% reduction in polyphenols to amino acids ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. macrophylla reduced the tea polyphenols to amino acids ratio by 26%.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
F. macrophyllae0
Outcome
polyphenols to amino acids ratioe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“F. macrophylla improved tea quality by an 8% increase in soluble sugar and a 26% reduction in polyphenols to amino acids ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1157 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify F. macrophylla as a suitable tea aphid trap crop.

Taxon
teae0
Interactor
tea aphide0pest
Outcome
suitable trap crop for tea aphid controle0

Verbatim

e0

“F. macrophylla is a suitable trap crop for tea aphid control in tea plantations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1277 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.