Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Intercropping Different Legumes in Tea Plantation Improves Soil Properties and Tea Quality Components by Regulating Rhizosphere Soil Microorganisms

Mengjuan Chen; Pinqian Zhou; Qiang Bao; et al.

17
claims
52
verbatim quotes
7
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Intercropping legumes is an effective and sustainable planting pattern that has the benefit of decreasing chemical fertilizer input and improving the soil environment. However, the effects of chemical fertilizer reduction and intercropping different legumes on soil nutrients, microorganisms, and tea quality remain elusive. Hereby, compared with 100% chemical fertilizer (CK), Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer to investigate its effect on soil nutrients, microorganisms, and tea quality. The results showed that compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, inorganic nitrogen, and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen. Intercropping systems significantly enhanced the content of non-ester-type catechins (catechin and gallocatechin) and ester-type catechins (epicatechin gallate). In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively, while in CP, the content of these three compounds increased by 166.67%, 84.62%, and 19.08%, respectively. Significant differences in microbial composition were also observed under different systems. Actinobacteria, Rhodoplanes, and Thaumarchaeota were obviously enhanced in SC, while Rhodanobacter, Pseudolabrys, and Pedosphaera were manifestly improved in CP compared to those in the monoculture. Moreover, intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundances of CNP cycling functional genes, such as gpmB, mch, accD6, pgi-pmi, mcr, glmS, ACOX1 and fadB (carbohydrate metabolism), nirD and narI (nitrification), pmoB-amoB and hao (dissimilatory N reduction), and phoN (organic phosphoester hydrolysis). The relationship between intercropping systems and tea qualities was mainly established by soil nutrition and the abundance of C and N cycling functional microorganisms. This study provides more information on the relationship between soil nutrients, functional genes of microorganisms, and tea quality under tea/legume intercropping systems in tea plantations and offers a basis for the higher-performance intercropping pattern.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes in tea plantations increased soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogene0
Direction
greater concentrationse0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes in tea plantations increased soil inorganic nitrogen and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
inorganic nitrogen, and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogene2
Direction
greater concentrationse0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“inorganic nitrogen, and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, gallocatechin content increased by 146.67% compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Sesbania cannabinae4
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
gallocatechine3
Direction
increasede3
Value
146.67%e3
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
e3

“In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1098 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, catechin content increased by 107.69% compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Sesbania cannabinae4
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
catechine3
Direction
increasede3
Value
107.69%e3
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
e3

“In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1098 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, epicatechin gallate content increased by 21.05% compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Sesbania cannabinae4
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
epicatechin gallatee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
21.05%e3
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
e3

“In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1098 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, gallocatechin content increased by 166.67% compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Crotalaria pallida Blancoe4
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
gallocatechine3
Direction
increasede5
Value
166.67%e5
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
e3

“In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1098 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
e5

“while in CP, the content of these three compounds increased by 166.67%, 84.62%, and 19.08%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, catechin content increased by 84.62% compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Crotalaria pallida Blancoe4
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
catechine3
Direction
increasede5
Value
84.62%e5
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
e3

“In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1098 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
e5

“while in CP, the content of these three compounds increased by 166.67%, 84.62%, and 19.08%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, epicatechin gallate content increased by 19.08% compared with monocropping.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Crotalaria pallida Blancoe4
Treatment
intercropping legumese0
Outcome
epicatechin gallatee3
Direction
increasede5
Value
19.08%e5
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–754 · show in text ↑
e3

“In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1098 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
e5

“while in CP, the content of these three compounds increased by 166.67%, 84.62%, and 19.08%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, Actinobacteria, Rhodoplanes and Thaumarchaeota were enhanced compared with monoculture.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Sesbania cannabinae4
Treatment
intercropped plante4
Interactor
Actinobacteria, Rhodoplanes, and ThaumarchaeotaRhodoplanesActinomycetotaNitrososphaerotae6other
Outcome
Actinobacteria, Rhodoplanes, and Thaumarchaeotae6
Direction
enhancede6
Comparator
monoculturee6

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
e6

“Actinobacteria, Rhodoplanes, and Thaumarchaeota were obviously enhanced in SC, while Rhodanobacter, Pseudolabrys, and Pedosphaera were manifestly improved in CP compared to those in the monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, Rhodanobacter, Pseudolabrys and Pedosphaera were improved compared with monoculture.

Taxon
Teat0
Material
Crotalaria pallida Blancoe4
Treatment
intercropped plante4
Interactor
Rhodanobacter, Pseudolabrys, and PedosphaeraRhodanobacterPseudolabrysPedosphaerae6other
Outcome
Rhodanobacter, Pseudolabrys, and Pedosphaerae6
Direction
improvede6
Comparator
monoculturee6

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–505 · show in text ↑
e6

“Actinobacteria, Rhodoplanes, and Thaumarchaeota were obviously enhanced in SC, while Rhodanobacter, Pseudolabrys, and Pedosphaera were manifestly improved in CP compared to those in the monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the carbohydrate-metabolism genes gpmB, mch and accD6.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese7
Gene
gpmB, mch, accD6e7
Outcome
abundances of CNP cycling functional genese7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“Moreover, intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundances of CNP cycling functional genes, such as gpmB, mch, accD6, pgi-pmi, mcr, glmS, ACOX1 and fadB (carbohydrate metabolism), nirD and narI (nitrification), pmoB-amoB and hao (dissimilatory N reduction), and phoN (organic phosphoester hydrolysis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the carbohydrate-metabolism genes pgi-pmi, mcr and glmS.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese7
Gene
pgi-pmi, mcr, glmSe7
Outcome
abundances of CNP cycling functional genese7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“Moreover, intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundances of CNP cycling functional genes, such as gpmB, mch, accD6, pgi-pmi, mcr, glmS, ACOX1 and fadB (carbohydrate metabolism), nirD and narI (nitrification), pmoB-amoB and hao (dissimilatory N reduction), and phoN (organic phosphoester hydrolysis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the genes ACOX1 and fadB.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese7
Gene
ACOX1 and fadBe7
Outcome
abundances of CNP cycling functional genese7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“Moreover, intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundances of CNP cycling functional genes, such as gpmB, mch, accD6, pgi-pmi, mcr, glmS, ACOX1 and fadB (carbohydrate metabolism), nirD and narI (nitrification), pmoB-amoB and hao (dissimilatory N reduction), and phoN (organic phosphoester hydrolysis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the nitrification genes nirD and narI.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese7
Gene
nirD and narIe7
Outcome
abundances of CNP cycling functional genese7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“Moreover, intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundances of CNP cycling functional genes, such as gpmB, mch, accD6, pgi-pmi, mcr, glmS, ACOX1 and fadB (carbohydrate metabolism), nirD and narI (nitrification), pmoB-amoB and hao (dissimilatory N reduction), and phoN (organic phosphoester hydrolysis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the dissimilatory nitrogen reduction genes pmoB-amoB and hao.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese7
Gene
pmoB-amoB and haoe7
Outcome
abundances of CNP cycling functional genese7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“Moreover, intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundances of CNP cycling functional genes, such as gpmB, mch, accD6, pgi-pmi, mcr, glmS, ACOX1 and fadB (carbohydrate metabolism), nirD and narI (nitrification), pmoB-amoB and hao (dissimilatory N reduction), and phoN (organic phosphoester hydrolysis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the organic phosphoester hydrolysis gene phoN.

Taxon
Teat0
Treatment
intercropping legumese7
Gene
phoNe7
Outcome
abundances of CNP cycling functional genese7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“Moreover, intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundances of CNP cycling functional genes, such as gpmB, mch, accD6, pgi-pmi, mcr, glmS, ACOX1 and fadB (carbohydrate metabolism), nirD and narI (nitrification), pmoB-amoB and hao (dissimilatory N reduction), and phoN (organic phosphoester hydrolysis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1810 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relationship between intercropping systems and tea quality was mainly established by soil nutrition and the abundance of C and N cycling microorganisms.

Taxon
teae1
Outcome
tea qualitiese1
Qualifier
soil nutritione1

Verbatim

t0

“Tea Plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relationship between intercropping systems and tea qualities was mainly established by soil nutrition and the abundance of C and N cycling functional microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1980 · show in text ↑

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.