Claim · model-written summary
In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, catechin content increased by 84.62% compared with monocropping.
- Taxon
- Teat0
- Material
- Crotalaria pallida Blancoe4
- Treatment
- intercropping legumese0
- Outcome
- catechine3
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 84.62%e5
- Comparator
- monocroppinge0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Tea Plantation”
e0“compared with monocropping, intercropping legumes had greater concentrations of the soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen”
e3“In SC, the content of gallocatechin, catechin, and epicatechin gallate increased by 146.67%, 107.69%, and 21.05%, respectively”
e4“Sesbania cannabina (SC) and Crotalaria pallida Blanco (CP) were selected as the intercropped plant with 70% chemical fertilizer”
e5“while in CP, the content of these three compounds increased by 166.67%, 84.62%, and 19.08%, respectively”
Title
Mengjuan Chen; Pinqian Zhou; Qiang Bao; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15030511
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes in tea plantations increased soil labile organic matter, nitrate nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen compared with monocropping.
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes in tea plantations increased soil inorganic nitrogen and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen compared with monocropping.
- Intervention effect In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, gallocatechin content increased by 146.67% compared with monocropping.
- Intervention effect In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, catechin content increased by 107.69% compared with monocropping.
- Intervention effect In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, epicatechin gallate content increased by 21.05% compared with monocropping.
- Intervention effect In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, gallocatechin content increased by 166.67% compared with monocropping.
- Intervention effect In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, epicatechin gallate content increased by 19.08% compared with monocropping.
- Intervention effect In Sesbania cannabina intercropping, Actinobacteria, Rhodoplanes and Thaumarchaeota were enhanced compared with monoculture.
- Intervention effect In Crotalaria pallida intercropping, Rhodanobacter, Pseudolabrys and Pedosphaera were improved compared with monoculture.
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the carbohydrate-metabolism genes gpmB, mch and accD6.
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the carbohydrate-metabolism genes pgi-pmi, mcr and glmS.
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the genes ACOX1 and fadB.
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the nitrification genes nirD and narI.
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the dissimilatory nitrogen reduction genes pmoB-amoB and hao.
- Intervention effect Intercropping legumes significantly increased the abundance of the organic phosphoester hydrolysis gene phoN.
- Mechanism The relationship between intercropping systems and tea quality was mainly established by soil nutrition and the abundance of C and N cycling microorganisms.