Paper · 2010 · ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA

Effects of Waterlogging Time on Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Growth and Yield

Song Feng

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A huge amount of precipitation and higher water table during rapeseed growing season in Yangtze River regions grown with rice and rapeseed rotation system and heavy soil result in frequent waterlogging occurrence.A pot experiment was performed at four growth stages with three waterlogging time treatments which were followed by normal water administration.Two rapeseed lines with different levels of waterlogging tolerance were used to investigate the effects of the sustainable waterlogging time on rapeseed growth and yield.The treatments were waterlogging of 10,20 and 30 days at seedling and budding stages and 10,15 and 20 days at flowering and maturity stages.The results showed that (1) the sustainable waterlogging time affected the development of roots,the growth of up-ground part of plant and yield,which was significantly different between two lines;(2) waterlogging at seedling stage led to the decrease of chlorophyll content in leaves,and the increase of malondialdehyde and proline contents;(3) sensitivity to waterlogging judged by yield in different developmental stages of rapeseed ranked in the order of budding stage,flowering stage,seedling stage,podding and maturity stages;(4) the research on effects of sustainable waterlogging time on yield can provide a basis for estimating the influence of continuous rainfall on rapeseed production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging duration affected root development.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Material
two linese0
Treatment
sustainable waterlogging timee0
Outcome
development of rootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the sustainable waterlogging time affected the development of roots,the growth of up-ground part of plant and yield,which was significantly different between two lines;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging duration affected shoot growth.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
sustainable waterlogging timee0
Outcome
growth of up-ground part of plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the sustainable waterlogging time affected the development of roots,the growth of up-ground part of plant and yield,which was significantly different between two lines;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging duration affected yield differently between lines.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
sustainable waterlogging timee0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
two linese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the sustainable waterlogging time affected the development of roots,the growth of up-ground part of plant and yield,which was significantly different between two lines;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling-stage waterlogging decreased leaf chlorophyll.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
waterlogging at seedling stagee0
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leavese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“waterlogging at seedling stage led to the decrease of chlorophyll content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling-stage waterlogging increased malondialdehyde.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
waterlogging at seedling stagee0
Outcome
malondialdehydee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“waterlogging at seedling stage led to the decrease of chlorophyll content in leaves,and the increase of malondialdehyde and proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling-stage waterlogging increased proline.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
waterlogging at seedling stagee0
Outcome
proline contentse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“waterlogging at seedling stage led to the decrease of chlorophyll content in leaves,and the increase of malondialdehyde and proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By yield, budding was the most sensitive stage, followed by flowering, seedling, podding, and maturity.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Outcome
sensitivity to waterlogging judged by yielde0
Direction
rankede0
Qualifier
budding stage,flowering stage,seedling stage,podding and maturity stagese0

Verbatim

e0

“sensitivity to waterlogging judged by yield in different developmental stages of rapeseed ranked in the order of budding stage,flowering stage,seedling stage,podding and maturity stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1197 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

flooding · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

flooding · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.