Paper · 2013 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Physiological Differences of Different Waterlogging-Resistant Brassica napus L. under Waterlogging Stress

Jin Ya

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The morphological performance and physiological mechanism of Brassica napus under water stress were studied by waterlogging(submergence) treatment of the seedlings of waterlogging-resistant line WR-4 and waterlogging-susceptible line WR-24. The contents of soluble sugar and proline, and activities of SOD and MDA content in the seedlings were measured. Results showed that after submergence treatment, WR-4 performed a well-developed root system with more branch hair on the main root. The root length of WR-4 increased by 9.4% compared to control. The dry weight of WR-4 from 6 d submergence+3 d recovery treatment increased more than WR-24. The soluble sugar and proline content in leaf of WR-4 from 6 d submergence+1 d recovery treatment increased more than WR-24. Content of MDA in leaves of WR-4 decreased after 6 d submergence+1 d recovery, while that in WR-24 was increasing. Through histochemical staining, WR-4 accumulated less hydrogen peroxide(H 2 O 2) and superoxide anion(O 2 ˉ·) in leaves comparing to WR-24. And its SOD activity was significantly higher than WR-24. It indicated that WR-4, the waterlogging-resistant line showed a strong ability to restore damage resulting from water stress by increasing the content of soluble sugar and proline, and timely starting antioxidant enzyme system to defend against oxidative damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Submerged WR-4 developed a well-developed root system with more branch hair.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e0
Organ / stage
main roote0
Treatment
submergence treatmente0
Outcome
well-developed root system with more branch hair on the main roote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after submergence treatment, WR-4 performed a well-developed root system with more branch hair on the main root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Submergence increased WR-4 root length by 9.4% versus control.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e0
Treatment
submergence treatmente1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root length of WR-4 increased by 9.4% compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“after submergence treatment, WR-4 performed a well-developed root system with more branch hair on the main root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 6 d submergence and 3 d recovery, WR-4 dry weight rose more than WR-24.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e0
Treatment
6 d submergence+3 d recovery treatmente0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increased moree0
Comparator
WR-24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weight of WR-4 from 6 d submergence+3 d recovery treatment increased more than WR-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 6 d submergence and 1 d recovery, leaf soluble sugar and proline rose more in WR-4 than WR-24.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
6 d submergence+1 d recovery treatmente0
Outcome
soluble sugar and proline contente0
Direction
increased moree0
Comparator
WR-24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble sugar and proline content in leaf of WR-4 from 6 d submergence+1 d recovery treatment increased more than WR-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf MDA in WR-4 decreased after 6 d submergence and 1 d recovery.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
6 d submergence+1 d recoverye0
Outcome
Content of MDAe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Content of MDA in leaves of WR-4 decreased after 6 d submergence+1 d recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf MDA in WR-24 increased after submergence and recovery.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-24e0
Treatment
submergencee1
Outcome
Content of MDAe2
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while that in WR-24 was increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“after submergence treatment, WR-4 performed a well-developed root system with more branch hair on the main root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–485 · show in text ↑
e2

“Content of MDA in leaves of WR-4 decreased after 6 d submergence+1 d recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–846 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WR-4 leaves accumulated less hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion than WR-24.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide(H 2 O 2) and superoxide anion(O 2 ˉ·)e0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
WR-24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WR-4 accumulated less hydrogen peroxide(H 2 O 2) and superoxide anion(O 2 ˉ·) in leaves comparing to WR-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WR-4 SOD activity was significantly higher than WR-24.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e1
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
WR-24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its SOD activity was significantly higher than WR-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“after submergence treatment, WR-4 performed a well-developed root system with more branch hair on the main root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–485 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute WR-4 recovery from water stress to soluble sugar, proline, and antioxidant defenses.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
WR-4e0
Outcome
restore damage resulting from water stresse0
Qualifier
increasing the content of soluble sugar and proline, and timely starting antioxidant enzyme systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WR-4, the waterlogging-resistant line showed a strong ability to restore damage resulting from water stress by increasing the content of soluble sugar and proline, and timely starting antioxidant enzyme system to defend against oxidative damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

flooding · physiology: oxidative · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

flooding · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

rewatering · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.