Paper · 2012 · Xibei nongye xuebao

Seed Tuber Treatment for the Control of Potato Tuber Rot

Quan Junli

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The tuber rot disease is a serious problem for potato production in Northern Shaanxi.In this study,seed tuber treatment and foliar application of chemicals were assessed to evaluate disease control efficiency based on the potato yield and percentage of marketable tubers.The causal agent for tuber rot was also preliminarily examined.The results showed that both seed tuber treatment with 50% dimethomorph WP and foliar application of different fungicides significantly increased potato yield,and percentage of marketable tuber.A combination of seed tuber treatment and subsequent foliar application further improved tuber rot control,by 15.7%,and 27.6% increase in yield and market value,respectively,compared with the foliar application.Extensive examination of tuber rot causal agent excluded the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans.Seed tuber treatment is an important component in the integrated control of potato diseases in Northern Shaanxi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed tuber treatment with 50% dimethomorph WP significantly increased potato yield and marketable tuber percentage.

Treatment
seed tuber treatment with 50% dimethomorph WPe0
Outcome
potato yield,and percentage of marketable tubere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both seed tuber treatment with 50% dimethomorph WP and foliar application of different fungicides significantly increased potato yield,and percentage of marketable tuber.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicides significantly increased potato yield and marketable tuber percentage.

Treatment
foliar application of different fungicidese0
Outcome
potato yield,and percentage of marketable tubere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both seed tuber treatment with 50% dimethomorph WP and foliar application of different fungicides significantly increased potato yield,and percentage of marketable tuber.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seed tuber and foliar treatment improved tuber rot control over foliar application.

Treatment
A combination of seed tuber treatment and subsequent foliar applicatione0
Outcome
tuber rot controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of seed tuber treatment and subsequent foliar application further improved tuber rot control,by 15.7%,and 27.6% increase in yield and market value,respectively,compared with the foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination treatment increased potato yield by 15.7% over foliar application.

Treatment
A combination of seed tuber treatment and subsequent foliar applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15.7%e0
Comparator
the foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of seed tuber treatment and subsequent foliar application further improved tuber rot control,by 15.7%,and 27.6% increase in yield and market value,respectively,compared with the foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination treatment increased market value by 27.6% over foliar application.

Treatment
A combination of seed tuber treatment and subsequent foliar applicatione0
Outcome
market valuee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27.6%e0
Comparator
the foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of seed tuber treatment and subsequent foliar application further improved tuber rot control,by 15.7%,and 27.6% increase in yield and market value,respectively,compared with the foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Examination excluded Phytophthora infestans as the tuber rot causal agent.

Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
tuber rot causal agente0
Direction
excludede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extensive examination of tuber rot causal agent excluded the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify seed tuber treatment as important for integrated potato disease control.

Treatment
Seed tuber treatmente0
Outcome
integrated control of potato diseasese0
Setting
Northern Shaanxie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed tuber treatment is an important component in the integrated control of potato diseases in Northern Shaanxi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑

fungicide · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.