Paper · 2012 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Study on the Construction of Group Structure and Physiological Index of High-yield Hybrid Seed Production in Spring Maize

Sang Zhi-qin

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】The experiment aimed to provide scientific and theoretical basis and technical guidance for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize.【Method】 Funong 22 was selected to study technical guidance for the high-yield seed production and physiological index,in which 7 densities and 3 levels of chemical regulator were used.【Result】The results showed that the treating of 97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride had the biggest production,which the production of living things is 31 102.5 kg/hm2,the grain weight is 185.03 g,economic coefficient is 0.58,the total photosynthetic power is 5 355.1 thousand(m2·d)/hm2,The average net photosynthetic rate was 6.31 g/(m2·d),the productivity of dry matter is 211.2 kg/(hm2·d).【Conclusion】 Chemical control can decrease the height of the maize and improve the productivity,direction and position of dry matter,increase the proportion of economic output and biological yield and transformation efficiency.Too sparse or too dense planting and too little or too much chemical control can both cause unfavorable effect on the construction of suitable group structure,thus reducing its economic output.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting 97.5 thousand plants/hm2 with 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride gave the biggest production of Funong 22 maize, 31 102.5 kg/hm2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Funong 22e7
Treatment
97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
productione1
Direction
biggeste1
Value
31 102.5 kg/hm2e2
Comparator
7 densities and 3 levels of chemical regulatore7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treating of 97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride had the biggest production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–466 · show in text ↑
e2

“the production of living things is 31 102.5 kg/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–523 · show in text ↑
e7

“Funong 22 was selected to study technical guidance for the high-yield seed production and physiological index,in which 7 densities and 3 levels of chemical regulator were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the 97.5 thousand plants/hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride treatment, grain weight of maize was 185.03 g.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
grain weighte3
Value
185.03 ge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treating of 97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride had the biggest production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–466 · show in text ↑
e3

“the grain weight is 185.03 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same treatment, the economic coefficient of maize was 0.58.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
economic coefficiente4
Value
0.58e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treating of 97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride had the biggest production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–466 · show in text ↑
e4

“economic coefficient is 0.58”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same treatment, total photosynthetic power of maize was 5 355.1 thousand(m2·d)/hm2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
total photosynthetic powere5
Value
5 355.1 thousand(m2·d)/hm2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treating of 97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride had the biggest production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–466 · show in text ↑
e5

“the total photosynthetic power is 5 355.1 thousand(m2·d)/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same treatment, average net photosynthetic rate of maize was 6.31 g/(m2·d).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
average net photosynthetic ratee6
Value
6.31 g/(m2·d)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treating of 97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride had the biggest production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–466 · show in text ↑
e6

“The average net photosynthetic rate was 6.31 g/(m2·d)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–696 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same treatment, productivity of dry matter of maize was 211.2 kg/(hm2·d).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloridee1
Outcome
productivity of dry mattere7
Value
211.2 kg/(hm2·d)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treating of 97.5 thousand plant/ hm2 and 675 mL/hm2 chlormequat chloride had the biggest production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–466 · show in text ↑
e7

“the productivity of dry matter is 211.2 kg/(hm2·d)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical control decreased the height of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Chemical controle6
Outcome
height of the maizee6
Direction
decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“Chemical control can decrease the height of the maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical control increased the proportion of economic output and biological yield and transformation efficiency of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Chemical controle4
Outcome
proportion of economic output and biological yield and transformation efficiencye6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“Chemical control can decrease the height of the maize and improve the productivity,direction and position of dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–880 · show in text ↑
e6

“increase the proportion of economic output and biological yield and transformation efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical control improved the productivity of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Chemical controle4
Outcome
productivitye6
Direction
improvee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“Chemical control can decrease the height of the maize and improve the productivity,direction and position of dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–880 · show in text ↑
e6

“improve the productivity,direction and position of dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Too sparse or too dense planting, and too little or too much chemical control, reduced the economic output of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
too sparse or too dense plantinge5
Outcome
economic outpute5
Direction
reducinge5
Qualifier
too little or too much chemical controle5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-yield hybrid seed production in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–145 · show in text ↑
e5

“Too sparse or too dense planting and too little or too much chemical control can both cause unfavorable effect on the construction of suitable group structure,thus reducing its economic output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1167 · show in text ↑

chloride · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.