Abstract
Experiments were conducted to study the optimized fertilization for sugarcane in the acid lateritic red soil. The results showed that: the optimized fertilization obviously improved sugarcane growth, yield, sugar content and profit. The yield of optimized fertilization reached 120870.0 kg/ha, increased by 24181.2 kg/ha and by 25%;sugar content increased by 0.63 percentage point; sugar yield were 20221.55 kg/ha, increased by 4654.65 kg/ha and 29.9%, comparison with the conventional fertilization. The net income reached 54012.3 yuan(RMB)/ha,increased by 11910.0 yuan(RMB)/ha and 28.3% more than the conventional fertilization. The optimized fertilization was recommended for wide application to increase yield and income of sugarcane production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Optimized fertilization improved sugarcane growth.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the optimized fertilization obviously improved sugarcane growth, yield, sugar content and profit”
Claim · model-written summary
Optimized fertilization yielded 120870.0 kg/ha sugarcane, 24181.2 kg/ha or 25% above conventional fertilization.
Verbatim
e0“optimized fertilization for sugarcane in the acid lateritic red soil”
e1“The yield of optimized fertilization reached 120870.0 kg/ha, increased by 24181.2 kg/ha and by 25%;sugar content increased by 0.63 percentage point; sugar yield were 20221.55 kg/ha, increased by 4654.65 kg/ha and 29.9%, comparison with the conventional fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar content increased by 0.63 percentage point under optimized fertilization.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“optimized fertilization for sugarcane in the acid lateritic red soil”
e1“sugar content increased by 0.63 percentage point”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar yield under optimized fertilization reached 20221.55 kg/ha, up 4654.65 kg/ha or 29.9%.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 20221.55 kg/hae1
- Qualifier
- 4654.65 kg/ha and 29.9%e1
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizatione1
Not reportedTreatment
Verbatim
e0“optimized fertilization for sugarcane in the acid lateritic red soil”
e1“sugar yield were 20221.55 kg/ha, increased by 4654.65 kg/ha and 29.9%, comparison with the conventional fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
Net income with optimized fertilization was 54012.3 yuan(RMB)/ha, up 11910.0 yuan(RMB)/ha or 28.3%.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Outcome
- net incomee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 54012.3 yuan(RMB)/hae1
- Qualifier
- 11910.0 yuan(RMB)/ha and 28.3%e1
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizatione1
Not reportedTreatment
Verbatim
e0“optimized fertilization for sugarcane in the acid lateritic red soil”
e1“The net income reached 54012.3 yuan(RMB)/ha,increased by 11910.0 yuan(RMB)/ha and 28.3% more than the conventional fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended broad adoption of optimized fertilization for sugarcane yield and income.
Verbatim
e0“The optimized fertilization was recommended for wide application to increase yield and income of sugarcane production”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.