Paper · 2010

Effects of Organic Manure Application Combined with Chemical Fertilizers on Rice Nutrient Uptake and Distribution and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Luo Zhi-xiang

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chemical fertilizers,especially nitrogenous fertilizer,have played an important role on increasing paddy rice production. In this research,field experiment with 7 fertilizers under 225 kg/hm2 nitrogen amount and five high-yielding medium hybrid rice varieties has been conducted. Results showed that there were significant difference on nitrogen accumulation of leaf (NAL),nitrogen accumulation stem (NAS) and total nitrogen accumulation (TNA) between the compound application of the inorganic and organic fertilizer in A7,A6 and A5 with the corresponding treatments A2,A3 and A4. Varieties difference was showed mainly on NAL and TNA at the late development stages. Nitrogen harvest index (NHI) of A6 was highest,15.2% higher than no compound application with organic fertilizer treatment A5. Leaf and stem nitrogen apparent translate ratio (NATR) of A3 was highest,6.1% and 9.53% higher than A2 and A5,respectively. The nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) increased by 10% through compound application organic fertilizer. The biomass and grain yield of A4 were higher than those of the other treatments,50.6% and 16.4% higher than A1,respectively. Thus,the compounding organic fertilizer as base fertilizer was applied in favor of the nitrogen accumulation of leaf,stem and total plant. NATR was no significant difference in fertilizers test and higher yield varieties. The compound organic fertilizer can significantly increase NUE and NHI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and inorganic fertilizer combinations differed significantly from their corresponding treatments in leaf nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
compound application of the inorganic and organic fertilizer in A7,A6 and A5e0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation of leaf (NAL)e0
Comparator
corresponding treatments A2,A3 and A4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant difference on nitrogen accumulation of leaf (NAL),nitrogen accumulation stem (NAS) and total nitrogen accumulation (TNA) between the compound application of the inorganic and organic fertilizer in A7,A6 and A5 with the corresponding treatments A2,A3 and A4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer combinations differed significantly in stem nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
compound application of the inorganic and organic fertilizer in A7,A6 and A5e0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation stem (NAS)e0
Comparator
corresponding treatments A2,A3 and A4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant difference on nitrogen accumulation of leaf (NAL),nitrogen accumulation stem (NAS) and total nitrogen accumulation (TNA) between the compound application of the inorganic and organic fertilizer in A7,A6 and A5 with the corresponding treatments A2,A3 and A4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer combinations differed significantly in total nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
compound application of the inorganic and organic fertilizer in A7,A6 and A5e0
Outcome
total nitrogen accumulation (TNA)e0
Comparator
corresponding treatments A2,A3 and A4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant difference on nitrogen accumulation of leaf (NAL),nitrogen accumulation stem (NAS) and total nitrogen accumulation (TNA) between the compound application of the inorganic and organic fertilizer in A7,A6 and A5 with the corresponding treatments A2,A3 and A4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varietal differences appeared mainly in leaf nitrogen accumulation and total nitrogen accumulation at late stages.

Organ / stage
late development stagese0
Outcome
NAL and TNAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Varieties difference was showed mainly on NAL and TNA at the late development stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A6 had the highest nitrogen harvest index, 15.2% higher than A5.

Treatment
A6e0
Outcome
Nitrogen harvest index (NHI)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.2%e0
Comparator
treatment A5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen harvest index (NHI) of A6 was highest,15.2% higher than no compound application with organic fertilizer treatment A5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 had the highest leaf nitrogen apparent translate ratio, 6.1% above A2.

Treatment
A3e0
Outcome
Leaf and stem nitrogen apparent translate ratio (NATR)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.1%e0
Comparator
A2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf and stem nitrogen apparent translate ratio (NATR) of A3 was highest,6.1% and 9.53% higher than A2 and A5,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 had the highest stem nitrogen apparent translate ratio, 9.53% above A5.

Treatment
A3e0
Outcome
stem nitrogen apparent translate ratio (NATR)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.53%e0
Comparator
A5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf and stem nitrogen apparent translate ratio (NATR) of A3 was highest,6.1% and 9.53% higher than A2 and A5,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining organic fertilizer increased nitrogen use efficiency by 10%.

Treatment
compound application organic fertilizere0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) increased by 10% through compound application organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A4 biomass was highest among treatments and 50.6% above A1.

Treatment
A4e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
50.6%e0
Comparator
A1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The biomass and grain yield of A4 were higher than those of the other treatments,50.6% and 16.4% higher than A1,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A4 grain yield was highest among treatments and 16.4% above A1.

Treatment
A4e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.4%e0
Comparator
A1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The biomass and grain yield of A4 were higher than those of the other treatments,50.6% and 16.4% higher than A1,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen apparent translate ratio did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments and high yielding varieties.

Outcome
NATRe0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“NATR was no significant difference in fertilizers test and higher yield varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound organic fertilizer significantly increased nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen harvest index.

Treatment
compound organic fertilizere0
Outcome
NUE and NHIe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The compound organic fertilizer can significantly increase NUE and NHI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1436 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.