Paper · 2004 · Biotechnology(Faisalabad)

Effect of Ampicillin and Red Light on the Chrysanthemum's Root Formation and Physiological Active

Ping Liu

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment uses chrysanthemum as material.Put the chrysanthemum stems which are conditioned by ampicillin into red light and natural light to test the root formation and physiological active.The purpose is to make sure if ampicillin and red light could make the root formation and physiological active of chrysanthemum stems better together.Put the stems of the chrysanthemum into different types of ampicillin solution whose concentration are 100mg·L~(-1),200mg·L~(-1),300mg·L~(-1) and 400mg·L~(-1) for 12 hours.Then water cultures them respectively in red light and in natural light and contrast with tap water.The result shows that the stems in red light have earlier root formation,higher root formation rate,more roots,better growth potential,more Chl in leaves and more amount of soluble sugar than the stems in natural light.What's more,relative conductivity,MDA content,IAA oxidase are lower in red light.So the kind of ampicillin which concentration is 200mg·L~(-1) can do the best to help the stems to take root,decrease relative electrical conductivity and the content of MDA and lower the activity of IAA oxidase in red light.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum stems in red light formed roots earlier than stems in natural light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
root formatione0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
natural lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The result shows that the stems in red light have earlier root formation,higher root formation rate,more roots,better growth potential,more Chl in leaves and more amount of soluble sugar than the stems in natural light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum stems in red light had a higher root formation rate than stems in natural light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
root formation ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
natural lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The result shows that the stems in red light have earlier root formation,higher root formation rate,more roots,better growth potential,more Chl in leaves and more amount of soluble sugar than the stems in natural light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum stems in red light had more roots than stems in natural light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
natural lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The result shows that the stems in red light have earlier root formation,higher root formation rate,more roots,better growth potential,more Chl in leaves and more amount of soluble sugar than the stems in natural light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum stems in red light had better growth potential than stems in natural light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
growth potentiale0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
natural lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The result shows that the stems in red light have earlier root formation,higher root formation rate,more roots,better growth potential,more Chl in leaves and more amount of soluble sugar than the stems in natural light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum stems in red light had more Chl in leaves than stems in natural light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
Chl in leavese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
natural lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The result shows that the stems in red light have earlier root formation,higher root formation rate,more roots,better growth potential,more Chl in leaves and more amount of soluble sugar than the stems in natural light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysanthemum stems in red light had a greater amount of soluble sugar than stems in natural light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
amount of soluble sugare0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
natural lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The result shows that the stems in red light have earlier root formation,higher root formation rate,more roots,better growth potential,more Chl in leaves and more amount of soluble sugar than the stems in natural light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative conductivity, MDA content and IAA oxidase activity were lower in chrysanthemum stems in red light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red lighte1
Outcome
relative conductivity,MDA content,IAA oxidasee1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“What's more,relative conductivity,MDA content,IAA oxidase are lower in red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–917 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 200 mg/L ampicillin in red light is best for helping chrysanthemum stems take root.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
200mg·L~(-1)e2
Outcome
help the stems to take roote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“So the kind of ampicillin which concentration is 200mg·L~(-1) can do the best to help the stems to take root,decrease relative electrical conductivity and the content of MDA and lower the activity of IAA oxidase in red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1142 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: osmolytes · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

63 papers: 47 positive, 16 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.