Paper · 2009 · Shandong Agricultural Sciences

Dynamic Changes of Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod During Flowering and Flowering Reversion

LI Run-wen

11
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the content change of soluble sugar,sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA in chrysanthemum leaves during flowering and flowering reversion with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material under three different photoperiod treatments.The results showed that the contents of soluble sugar,sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA in chrysanthemum leaves didn't change significantly,and the flower bud was not observed under the continuous long-day conditions,while the contents of soluble sugar and sucrose decreased,and the contents of soluble protein,DNA and RNA increased significantly under the continuous short-day conditions.As for the short-day and then long-day treated plants,the flower buds formed under short-day conditions didn't develop after transferred to long-day conditions,and didn't bloom finally.Its content of soluble sugar decreased compared with that of long-day treated plants,but increased compared with that of short-day treated plants after 15-day photoperiod treatment,while the contents of sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA increased significantly compared with those of other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under continuous long-day conditions, leaf soluble sugar, sucrose and soluble protein did not change significantly.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
continuous long-day conditionse2
Outcome
soluble sugar,sucrose,soluble proteine2
Direction
didn't change significantlye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the contents of soluble sugar,sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA in chrysanthemum leaves didn't change significantly,and the flower bud was not observed under the continuous long-day conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under continuous long-day conditions, leaf DNA and RNA did not change significantly.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
continuous long-day conditionse2
Outcome
DNA and RNAe2
Direction
didn't change significantlye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the contents of soluble sugar,sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA in chrysanthemum leaves didn't change significantly,and the flower bud was not observed under the continuous long-day conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No flower bud was observed under continuous long-day conditions.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
continuous long-day conditionse2
Outcome
flower bude2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that the contents of soluble sugar,sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA in chrysanthemum leaves didn't change significantly,and the flower bud was not observed under the continuous long-day conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under continuous short-day conditions, leaf soluble sugar and sucrose decreased.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
continuous short-day conditionse3
Outcome
soluble sugar and sucrosee3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the contents of soluble sugar and sucrose decreased,and the contents of soluble protein,DNA and RNA increased significantly under the continuous short-day conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under continuous short-day conditions, leaf soluble protein, DNA and RNA increased significantly.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
continuous short-day conditionse3
Outcome
soluble protein,DNA and RNAe3
Direction
increased significantlye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the contents of soluble sugar and sucrose decreased,and the contents of soluble protein,DNA and RNA increased significantly under the continuous short-day conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower buds formed under short-day conditions did not develop after transfer to long-day conditions.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
transferred to long-day conditionse4
Outcome
flower buds formed under short-day conditions didn't develope4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e4

“the flower buds formed under short-day conditions didn't develop after transferred to long-day conditions,and didn't bloom finally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants transferred from short-day to long-day conditions did not bloom.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
transferred to long-day conditionse4
Outcome
bloome4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e4

“the flower buds formed under short-day conditions didn't develop after transferred to long-day conditions,and didn't bloom finally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 15 days, soluble sugar content in short-day then long-day plants was lower than in long-day plants.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
15-day photoperiod treatmente5
Outcome
content of soluble sugare5
Direction
decreasede5
Comparator
long-day treated plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e5

“Its content of soluble sugar decreased compared with that of long-day treated plants,but increased compared with that of short-day treated plants after 15-day photoperiod treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 15 days, soluble sugar content in short-day then long-day plants was higher than in short-day plants.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
15-day photoperiod treatmente5
Outcome
content of soluble sugare5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
short-day treated plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e5

“Its content of soluble sugar decreased compared with that of long-day treated plants,but increased compared with that of short-day treated plants after 15-day photoperiod treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After 15 days, sucrose and soluble protein increased significantly in short-day then long-day plants compared with other treatments.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
15-day photoperiod treatmente5
Outcome
sucrose,soluble proteine6
Direction
increased significantlye6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e5

“Its content of soluble sugar decreased compared with that of long-day treated plants,but increased compared with that of short-day treated plants after 15-day photoperiod treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1029 · show in text ↑
e6

“while the contents of sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA increased significantly compared with those of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After 15 days, DNA and RNA increased significantly in short-day then long-day plants compared with other treatments.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cut flower cultivar Shenmae1
Treatment
15-day photoperiod treatmente5
Outcome
DNA and RNAe6
Direction
increased significantlye6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological Metabolism in Chrysanthemum Induced by Photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“with cut flower cultivar Shenma as test material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–227 · show in text ↑
e5

“Its content of soluble sugar decreased compared with that of long-day treated plants,but increased compared with that of short-day treated plants after 15-day photoperiod treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1029 · show in text ↑
e6

“while the contents of sucrose,soluble protein,DNA and RNA increased significantly compared with those of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1151 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: osmolytes · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.