Paper · 2008

Effects of Different Light Quality Ratios of LED on Growth of Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro

Di Xiu

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of different ratios of Red [R,(658±20) nm]/Far-red [Fr,(715±20) nm] and Red/Blue [B,(460±20) nm] generated by light emitting diodes (LED) on growth of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema morifolium) plantlets in vitro were studied. As the results showed,red LED promoted the growth of chrysanthemum plant-lets and increased root length,contrary to far-red LED and blue LED. Carotenoid content was negatively related to R/Fr ratios. The contents of chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b,chlorophyll (a+b) and carotenoid were also nega-tively related to R/B ratios. Chlorophyll a/b ratios were correlated with R/B and R/Fr ratios positively. Red LED promoted the accumulation of soluble sugar and starch,but decreased pigment contents. On the contrary,blue LED enhanced the synthesis of pigment contents and soluble proteins. Both the contents of soluble sugar,starch in leaves and the root activity were higher under the complex light of red and blue LED than those under the fluorescent light. Especially,the plantlets grew more stronger and the highest survival rate of transplanted plantlets were observed under the light of high R/B ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED promoted growth of chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro, compared with far-red and blue LED.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red LEDe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
far-red LED and blue LEDe0
Setting
in vitrot0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“red LED promoted the growth of chrysanthemum plant-lets and increased root length,contrary to far-red LED and blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED increased root length of chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro, compared with far-red and blue LED.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
red LEDe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
far-red LED and blue LEDe0
Setting
in vitrot0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“red LED promoted the growth of chrysanthemum plant-lets and increased root length,contrary to far-red LED and blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–376 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid content decreased as the R/Fr ratio increased.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
R/Fr ratiose1
Outcome
Carotenoid contente1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carotenoid content was negatively related to R/Fr ratios. The contents of chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b,chlorophyll (a+b) and carotenoid were also nega-tively related to R/B ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–556 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and chlorophyll (a+b) contents decreased as the R/B ratio increased.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
R/B ratiose1
Outcome
chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b,chlorophyll (a+b)e1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carotenoid content was negatively related to R/Fr ratios. The contents of chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b,chlorophyll (a+b) and carotenoid were also nega-tively related to R/B ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–556 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid content decreased as the R/B ratio increased.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
R/B ratiose1
Outcome
carotenoide1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carotenoid content was negatively related to R/Fr ratios. The contents of chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b,chlorophyll (a+b) and carotenoid were also nega-tively related to R/B ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–556 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a/b ratio was positively correlated with the R/B ratio.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
R/Be2
Outcome
Chlorophyll a/b ratiose2
Direction
positivelye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorophyll a/b ratios were correlated with R/B and R/Fr ratios positively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–632 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a/b ratio was positively correlated with the R/Fr ratio.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
R/Fr ratiose2
Outcome
Chlorophyll a/b ratiose2
Direction
positivelye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorophyll a/b ratios were correlated with R/B and R/Fr ratios positively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED promoted accumulation of soluble sugar and starch in chrysanthemum plantlets.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Red LEDe3
Outcome
accumulation of soluble sugar and starche3
Direction
promotede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Red LED promoted the accumulation of soluble sugar and starch,but decreased pigment contents. On the contrary,blue LED enhanced the synthesis of pigment contents and soluble proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED decreased pigment contents in chrysanthemum plantlets.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Red LEDe3
Outcome
pigment contentse3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Red LED promoted the accumulation of soluble sugar and starch,but decreased pigment contents. On the contrary,blue LED enhanced the synthesis of pigment contents and soluble proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LED enhanced the synthesis of pigment contents and soluble proteins in chrysanthemum plantlets.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
blue LEDe3
Outcome
synthesis of pigment contents and soluble proteinse3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Red LED promoted the accumulation of soluble sugar and starch,but decreased pigment contents. On the contrary,blue LED enhanced the synthesis of pigment contents and soluble proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar and starch contents in leaves and root activity were higher under complex red and blue LED light than under fluorescent light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
complex light of red and blue LEDe4
Outcome
the contents of soluble sugar,starch in leaves and the root activitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
fluorescent lighte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both the contents of soluble sugar,starch in leaves and the root activity were higher under the complex light of red and blue LED than those under the fluorescent light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest survival rate of transplanted plantlets was observed under high R/B ratio light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
high R/B ratioe5
Outcome
survival rate of transplanted plantletse5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“Especially,the plantlets grew more stronger and the highest survival rate of transplanted plantlets were observed under the light of high R/B ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlets grew more strongly under high R/B ratio light.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
high R/B ratioe5
Outcome
the plantlets grewe5
Direction
more strongere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum Plantlets in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“Especially,the plantlets grew more stronger and the highest survival rate of transplanted plantlets were observed under the light of high R/B ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1135 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: osmolytes · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

63 papers: 47 positive, 16 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · ChrysanthemumResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.