Paper · 2007 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effect of alfalfa-wheat rotation system on the quality and amino acid content of wheat in dryland of Loess Plateau

Zhixi Li

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the long-term fixed alfalfa-wheat rotation and fertilization experiment,this article studied the effect of rotation system and fertilization on the changes of wheat quality and amino acid content.The results showed that there was a difference in nutrition quality,farinograph parameters and amino acid quantity between alfalfa-wheat rotation and CK.Alfalfa-wheat rotation could improve nutritional quality of wheat,and could also increase paste strength and flexibility and decrease paste ductibility.There was the significant difference in gluten content and FQN between alfalfa-wheat rotation and wheat continuous cropping,but no significant difference observed in the content of amino acid between alfalfa-wheat rotation and wheat continuous cropping.The quality of wheat at second year wheat in rotation system were the best and amino acid content was the highest;however,the quality of wheat and amino acid content declined from the third year.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa-wheat rotation improved wheat nutritional quality versus CK.

Treatment
Alfalfa-wheat rotatione1
Outcome
nutritional quality of wheate1
Direction
improvee1
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa-wheat rotation and CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alfalfa-wheat rotation could improve nutritional quality of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation increased paste strength and flexibility.

Treatment
alfalfa-wheat rotatione0
Outcome
paste strength and flexibilitye1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa-wheat rotation and CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“could also increase paste strength and flexibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation decreased paste ductility.

Treatment
alfalfa-wheat rotatione0
Outcome
paste ductibilitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa-wheat rotation and CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“decrease paste ductibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten content and FQN differed significantly between rotation and continuous cropping.

Treatment
alfalfa-wheat rotatione0
Outcome
gluten content and FQNe0
Comparator
wheat continuous croppinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was the significant difference in gluten content and FQN between alfalfa-wheat rotation and wheat continuous cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid content did not differ significantly between rotation and continuous cropping.

Treatment
alfalfa-wheat rotatione0
Outcome
content of amino acide0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
wheat continuous croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference observed in the content of amino acid between alfalfa-wheat rotation and wheat continuous cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–762 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year wheat had the best quality and highest amino acid content in rotation.

Outcome
quality of wheate0
Direction
the beste0
Qualifier
second year wheat in rotation systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of wheat at second year wheat in rotation system were the best and amino acid content was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year rotation wheat had the highest amino acid content.

Outcome
amino acid contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
second year wheat in rotation systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of wheat at second year wheat in rotation system were the best and amino acid content was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat quality and amino acid content declined from the third rotation year.

Outcome
quality of wheat and amino acid contente0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
third yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of wheat and amino acid content declined from the third year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–957 · show in text ↑

rotation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

rotation · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.