Paper · 2008

Growth Characteristics of Rice under Simplified Cultivation with Wheat Residue Return

Zhou Chang-hai

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

With japonica rice Yangfujing 8 as material,dry matter production,yield formation and the related physiological traits of rice under simplified cultivations(direct seeding,mechanical transplanting and parachute transplanting)with wheat residue return and wheat residue removal were investigated.Compared with the rice plants under wheat residue removal,the panicle number of rice plants under wheat residue return was decreased slightly,whereas the number of grains per panicle,seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weight were all increased,leading to a significant increase in grain yield.Under wheat residue return,number of stems and tillers of rice was much lower at all the growth stages,and the photosynthetic potential,leaf area index and dry matter accumulation were lower before the heading stage but higher after heading stage than those under wheat residue removal.For rice plants under wheat residue return,the root-shoot ratio was higher at all the growth stages,and the high efficient leaf area and its ratio to total leaf area at the heading stage,the grain-leaf ratio,the exportation and transportation rates of carbohydrates stored in stems and sheaths and the harvest index were all higher than those for rice plants under wheat residue removal.Moreover,the root activity,root bleeding,photosynthetic rate and ATPase activity in grains of rice plants under wheat residue return were also higher than those of rice plants under wheat residue removal during grain filling stage.The physiological causes of high-yielding rice under wheat residue return were discussed,and the key regulatory approaches under wheat residue return in rice were put forward.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat residue return slightly decreased rice panicle number.

Treatment
wheat residue returne0
Outcome
panicle numbere0
Direction
decreased slightlye0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the rice plants under wheat residue removal,the panicle number of rice plants under wheat residue return was decreased slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat residue return increased rice grains per panicle, seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
wheat residue returne1
Outcome
number of grains per panicle,seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
wheat residue removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of grains per panicle,seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weight were all increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“under wheat residue return was decreased slightly,whereas the number of grains per panicle,seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weight were all increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–536 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice plants under wheat residue removal,the panicle number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat residue return significantly increased rice grain yield.

Treatment
wheat residue returnt0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
wheat residue removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to a significant increase in grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Simplified Cultivation with Wheat Residue Return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice plants under wheat residue removal,the panicle number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice stem and tiller number was much lower with residue return at all growth stages.

Treatment
wheat residue returne0
Outcome
number of stems and tillerse0
Direction
much lowere0
Qualifier
all the growth stagese0
Comparator
wheat residue removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under wheat residue return,number of stems and tillers of rice was much lower at all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“than those under wheat residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before heading, residue return lowered rice photosynthetic potential, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
wheat residue returne1
Outcome
photosynthetic potential,leaf area index and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
before the heading stagee0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic potential,leaf area index and dry matter accumulation were lower before the heading stage but higher after heading stage than those under wheat residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under wheat residue return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After heading, residue return raised rice photosynthetic potential, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
wheat residue returne1
Outcome
photosynthetic potential,leaf area index and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after heading stagee0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic potential,leaf area index and dry matter accumulation were lower before the heading stage but higher after heading stage than those under wheat residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under wheat residue return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue return increased rice root-shoot ratio at all growth stages.

Treatment
wheat residue returne0
Outcome
root-shoot ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
all the growth stagese0
Comparator
wheat residue removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For rice plants under wheat residue return,the root-shoot ratio was higher at all the growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“than those for rice plants under wheat residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At heading, residue return increased high efficient leaf area and its fraction of total leaf area.

Treatment
wheat residue returne1
Outcome
high efficient leaf area and its ratio to total leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at the heading stagee0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the high efficient leaf area and its ratio to total leaf area at the heading stage,the grain-leaf ratio,the exportation and transportation rates of carbohydrates stored in stems and sheaths and the harvest index were all higher than those for rice plants under wheat residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“For rice plants under wheat residue return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue return increased rice grain-leaf ratio and harvest index.

Treatment
wheat residue returne1
Outcome
grain-leaf ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
harvest indexe0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain-leaf ratio,the exportation and transportation rates of carbohydrates stored in stems and sheaths and the harvest index were all higher than those for rice plants under wheat residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“For rice plants under wheat residue return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue return increased exportation and transportation rates of carbohydrates stored in rice stems and sheaths.

Treatment
wheat residue returne1
Outcome
exportation and transportation rates of carbohydrates stored in stems and sheathse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the exportation and transportation rates of carbohydrates stored in stems and sheaths and the harvest index were all higher than those for rice plants under wheat residue removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“For rice plants under wheat residue return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During grain filling, residue return increased rice root activity, root bleeding and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
wheat residue returne0
Outcome
root activity,root bleeding,photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
grain filling stagee0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root activity,root bleeding,photosynthetic rate and ATPase activity in grains of rice plants under wheat residue return were also higher than those of rice plants under wheat residue removal during grain filling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During grain filling, residue return increased ATPase activity in rice grains.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
wheat residue returne0
Gene
ATPasee0
Outcome
ATPase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
grain filling stagee0
Comparator
wheat residue removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ATPase activity in grains of rice plants under wheat residue return were also higher than those of rice plants under wheat residue removal during grain filling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1490 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Triticum aestivum · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 16 positive, 10 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Triticum aestivum · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

79 papers: 64 positive, 15 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

organic · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

organic · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.