Paper · 2024 · Agriculture

Rational Utilization of Sediment Resources Improves Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency under Salt Stress

Shenghai Cheng; Aibin He; Xiayu Guo; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil salinization negatively affects rice growth and yield; however, how different sludge sources regulate rice growth and yield under salt stress was rarely investigated. This study evaluated the performance of two salt-tolerant rice cultivars, Chaoyou 1000 and Longliangyou 506, grown in two sediment sources, pond sediment (PS) and river sludge (RS), under salt stress (56 ds m−1 brine irrigation) with conventional soil (CS) used as the control. The results showed that the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments was enhanced by 51.0% and 43.6% as compared with CS, respectively, owing to an improvement in spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight, dry matter accumulation, and the chlorophyll content in both rice cultivars. Compared with CS, the total nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen grain production efficiency, nitrogen harvest index, and nitrogen partial productivity under the PS and RS treatments were increased by 18.9–28.9%, 17.0–20.6%, 7.2–16.6%, and 43.8–50.9%, respectively. Moreover, rice grown in PS and RS showed higher activities of nitrogen metabolism-related enzymes (nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthetase) at the heading stage and higher K+ and K+/Na+ contents in the leaves. Overall, a balanced utilization of sediment resources (especially pond sediment) can effectively alleviate salt stress and improve the yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen accumulation rose by 18.9–28.9% under the PS and RS treatments compared with CS.

Treatment
PS and RS treatmentse6
Outcome
total nitrogen accumulatione6
Direction
increasede6
Value
18.9–28.9%e6
Comparator
conventional soil (CS)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the total nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen grain production efficiency, nitrogen harvest index, and nitrogen partial productivity under the PS and RS treatments were increased by 18.9–28.9%, 17.0–20.6%, 7.2–16.6%, and 43.8–50.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–991 · show in text ↑
e3

“conventional soil (CS) used as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen grain production efficiency rose by 17.0–20.6% under the PS and RS treatments compared with CS.

Treatment
PS and RS treatmentse6
Outcome
nitrogen grain production efficiencye6
Direction
increasede6
Value
17.0–20.6%e6
Comparator
conventional soil (CS)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the total nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen grain production efficiency, nitrogen harvest index, and nitrogen partial productivity under the PS and RS treatments were increased by 18.9–28.9%, 17.0–20.6%, 7.2–16.6%, and 43.8–50.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–991 · show in text ↑
e3

“conventional soil (CS) used as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen harvest index rose by 7.2–16.6% under the PS and RS treatments compared with CS.

Treatment
PS and RS treatmentse6
Outcome
nitrogen harvest indexe6
Direction
increasede6
Value
7.2–16.6%e6
Comparator
conventional soil (CS)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the total nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen grain production efficiency, nitrogen harvest index, and nitrogen partial productivity under the PS and RS treatments were increased by 18.9–28.9%, 17.0–20.6%, 7.2–16.6%, and 43.8–50.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–991 · show in text ↑
e3

“conventional soil (CS) used as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen partial productivity rose by 43.8–50.9% under the PS and RS treatments compared with CS.

Treatment
PS and RS treatmentse6
Outcome
nitrogen partial productivitye6
Direction
increasede6
Value
43.8–50.9%e6
Comparator
conventional soil (CS)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the total nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen grain production efficiency, nitrogen harvest index, and nitrogen partial productivity under the PS and RS treatments were increased by 18.9–28.9%, 17.0–20.6%, 7.2–16.6%, and 43.8–50.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–991 · show in text ↑
e3

“conventional soil (CS) used as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–448 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen metabolism enzyme activities were higher at the heading stage in rice grown in PS and RS.

Organ / stage
heading stagee7
Treatment
PS and RSe7
Gene
nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthetasee7
Outcome
activities of nitrogen metabolism-related enzymese7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“rice grown in PS and RS showed higher activities of nitrogen metabolism-related enzymes (nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthetase) at the heading stage and higher K+ and K+/Na+ contents in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K+ and K+/Na+ contents were higher in rice grown in PS and RS.

Organ / stage
leavese7
Treatment
PS and RSe7
Outcome
K+ and K+/Na+ contentse7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“rice grown in PS and RS showed higher activities of nitrogen metabolism-related enzymes (nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthetase) at the heading stage and higher K+ and K+/Na+ contents in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight and dry matter accumulation improved under the PS and RS treatments compared with CS.

Treatment
PS and RS treatmentse1
Outcome
spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight, dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
improvemente1
Comparator
conventional soil (CS)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments was enhanced by 51.0% and 43.6% as compared with CS, respectively, owing to an improvement in spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight, dry matter accumulation, and the chlorophyll content in both rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–730 · show in text ↑
e3

“conventional soil (CS) used as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content improved under the PS and RS treatments compared with CS in both rice cultivars.

Treatment
PS and RS treatmentse1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
improvemente1
Comparator
conventional soil (CS)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments was enhanced by 51.0% and 43.6% as compared with CS, respectively, owing to an improvement in spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight, dry matter accumulation, and the chlorophyll content in both rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–730 · show in text ↑
e3

“conventional soil (CS) used as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–448 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice yield gain is attributed to the improvement in yield components, dry matter and chlorophyll content.

Outcome
rice yielde1
Qualifier
an improvement in spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight, dry matter accumulation, and the chlorophyll contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the rice yield under the PS and RS treatments was enhanced by 51.0% and 43.6% as compared with CS, respectively, owing to an improvement in spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight, dry matter accumulation, and the chlorophyll content in both rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–730 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A balanced use of sediment resources, especially pond sediment, can alleviate salt stress and improve rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency.

Outcome
alleviate salt stress and improve the yield and nitrogen use efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a balanced utilization of sediment resources (especially pond sediment) can effectively alleviate salt stress and improve the yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1405 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 96 positive, 10 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

organic · physiology: ion balance · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

organic · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

organic · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.