Abstract
The aim was to study the inhibition of chitosan hydrogel against the Penicillium italicum and preservation in‘Newhall'Navel orange.The experiment indicated that chitosan hydrogel had a certain inhibiting effect on the Penicillium italicum.In the meanwhile,the inhibiting rate was 42% and colony diameter and inhibiting zone was 15mm and 65mm after 5d cultivation,respectively.Also,it had the best quality of Navel orange after 90 days' storage when the concentration was 2.0%.The result showed that chitosan hydrogel had a clearly inhibiting effect on the Penicillium italicum and the ability to extend the freshness of navel orange,and the optimal one was 2.0%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan hydrogel inhibited Penicillium italicum at a rate of 42% after five days.
- Taxon
- Navel orange
Citrus sinensist0 - Treatment
- chitosan hydrogele0
- Interactor
- Penicillium italicum
Penicillium italicume0pathogen - Outcome
- inhibiting ratee0
- Direction
- inhibitinge0
- Value
- 42%e0
- Qualifier
- after 5d cultivatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chitosan hydrogel had a certain inhibiting effect on the Penicillium italicum.In the meanwhile,the inhibiting rate was 42% and colony diameter and inhibiting zone was 15mm and 65mm after 5d cultivation,respectively”
t0“Navel orange”
Claim · model-written summary
The Penicillium colony diameter was 15 mm after five days.
- Taxon
- Navel orangeCitrus sinensist0
- Interactor
- Penicillium italicumPenicillium italicume1pathogen
- Outcome
- colony diametere0
- Value
- 15mme0
- Qualifier
- after 5d cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the inhibiting rate was 42% and colony diameter and inhibiting zone was 15mm and 65mm after 5d cultivation,respectively”
e1“against the Penicillium italicum”
t0“Navel orange”
Claim · model-written summary
The inhibition zone was 65 mm after five days.
- Taxon
- Navel orangeCitrus sinensist0
- Interactor
- Penicillium italicumPenicillium italicume1pathogen
- Outcome
- inhibiting zonee0
- Value
- 65mme0
- Qualifier
- after 5d cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the inhibiting rate was 42% and colony diameter and inhibiting zone was 15mm and 65mm after 5d cultivation,respectively”
e1“against the Penicillium italicum”
t0“Navel orange”
Claim · model-written summary
At 2.0% hydrogel concentration, navel orange had the best quality after 90 days of storage.
- Taxon
- Navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- 2.0%e0
- Outcome
- quality of Navel orangee0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- after 90 days' storagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it had the best quality of Navel orange after 90 days' storage when the concentration was 2.0%”
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan hydrogel extended freshness of navel orange.
- Taxon
- navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- chitosan hydrogele0
- Outcome
- freshness of navel orangee0
- Direction
- extende0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chitosan hydrogel had a clearly inhibiting effect on the Penicillium italicum and the ability to extend the freshness of navel orange”
The same questions in other papers
chitosan · Penicillium italicum · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
chitosan · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.