Paper · 2002 · Journal of Inner Mongola Institute of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

EFFECTS OF AMF ON THE GROWTH OF WHEAT AND SOYBEAN

Hongli Zheng

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Both wheat(monocotyledon) and soybean(dicotyledon)were inoculated with two AMF Glomus mosseae(Glm)and Glomus versiforme(Glv).The result showed that AMF increased the chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomass of soybean.It was more significantly for soybean inoculated with Glv than with Glm.In addition,AMF had no obvious effect on the chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomass of wheat.It can be concluded that different crops had different dependence on AMF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae inoculation increased soybean chlorophyll, photosynthesis, and biomass.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomasse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both wheat(monocotyledon) and soybean(dicotyledon)were inoculated with two AMF Glomus mosseae(Glm)and Glomus versiforme(Glv)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF increased the chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomass of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus versiforme inoculation increased soybean chlorophyll, photosynthesis, and biomass.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Glomus versiformee0
Interactor
Glomus versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomasse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both wheat(monocotyledon) and soybean(dicotyledon)were inoculated with two AMF Glomus mosseae(Glm)and Glomus versiforme(Glv)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF increased the chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomass of soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus versiforme gave a more significant soybean response than Glomus mosseae.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Glve1
Interactor
Glomus versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Outcome
more significantlye1
Direction
more significantlye1
Comparator
Glme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both wheat(monocotyledon) and soybean(dicotyledon)were inoculated with two AMF Glomus mosseae(Glm)and Glomus versiforme(Glv)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was more significantly for soybean inoculated with Glv than with Glm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF had no obvious effect on wheat chlorophyll, photosynthesis, or biomass.

Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomasse1
Direction
no obvious effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both wheat(monocotyledon) and soybean(dicotyledon)were inoculated with two AMF Glomus mosseae(Glm)and Glomus versiforme(Glv)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF had no obvious effect on the chlorophyll content,photosyntheis rate and biomass of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–404 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat and soybean differed in their dependence on AMF.

Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
different dependence on AMFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different crops had different dependence on AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–477 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both wheat(monocotyledon) and soybean(dicotyledon)were inoculated with two AMF Glomus mosseae(Glm)and Glomus versiforme(Glv)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.