Paper · 2013 · Shenyang Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effects of Different Light Qualities Interlighting on Growth and Quality of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) Fruit in Greenhouse

Xie Jin

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To explore the responses and their mechanisms of cucumber fruit to different light qualities interlighting by LED in greenhouse. Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities(red:blue=8:1(8R1B), red:blue=6∶3(6R3B) and red:green:blue=6∶2∶1(6R2G1B), 15 μmol·m-2·s-1).The effects of interlighting different light qualities on fruit growth and quality were investigated. The fruit length, stem diameter and the fruit weight of cucumber under three interlighting treatments were higher than control treatment. Compared with the control treatment, the contents of vitamin C(VC) and the total amino acid had been obviously enhanced in the three interlighting treatments. The VC content was the highest in the 6R3B treatment, however, the contents of eight kinds of amino acids required by human body and others amino acid components were highest in the 8R1B treatment. Among the three interlighting treatments,only contents of soluble protein, soluble sugar, sucrose, fructose, starch and reducing sugar significantly increased in the 8R1B treatment compared with the control treatment. Three interlighting treatments during flowering and fruit periods had a certain promoting effects in the cucumber fruit growth, and the 8R1B treatment had the most significantly improved effects. The qualities of the cucumber fruits were improved by those interlighting treatments during flowering and fruit periods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit length, stem diameter and fruit weight of cucumber under three interlighting treatments were higher than under control

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
three interlighting treatmentse1
Outcome
fruit length, stem diameter and the fruit weighte1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
control treatmente1
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fruit length, stem diameter and the fruit weight of cucumber under three interlighting treatments were higher than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interlighting treatments enhanced vitamin C and total amino acid contents of cucumber fruit compared with control

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
three interlighting treatmentse2
Outcome
contents of vitamin C(VC) and the total amino acide2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with the control treatment, the contents of vitamin C(VC) and the total amino acid had been obviously enhanced in the three interlighting treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 6R3B interlighting treatment gave the highest vitamin C content in cucumber fruit

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
6R3Be3
Outcome
VC contente3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e3

“The VC content was the highest in the 6R3B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 8R1B interlighting treatment gave the highest contents of eight essential amino acids and other amino acid components

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
8R1Be4
Outcome
contents of eight kinds of amino acidse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e4

“the contents of eight kinds of amino acids required by human body and others amino acid components were highest in the 8R1B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 8R1B treatment significantly increased soluble protein, soluble sugar and sucrose compared with control

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
8R1B treatmente5
Outcome
soluble protein, soluble sugar, sucrosee5
Direction
significantly increasede5
Comparator
control treatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e5

“only contents of soluble protein, soluble sugar, sucrose, fructose, starch and reducing sugar significantly increased in the 8R1B treatment compared with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 8R1B treatment significantly increased fructose, starch and reducing sugar compared with control

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
8R1B treatmente5
Outcome
fructose, starch and reducing sugare5
Direction
significantly increasede5
Comparator
control treatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e5

“only contents of soluble protein, soluble sugar, sucrose, fructose, starch and reducing sugar significantly increased in the 8R1B treatment compared with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interlighting during flowering and fruit periods promoted cucumber fruit growth

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Three interlighting treatments during flowering and fruit periodse6
Outcome
fruit growthe6
Direction
promotinge6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e6

“Three interlighting treatments during flowering and fruit periods had a certain promoting effects in the cucumber fruit growth, and the 8R1B treatment had the most significantly improved effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 8R1B treatment had the most significantly improved effect on cucumber fruit growth

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
8R1B treatmente6
Outcome
fruit growthe6
Direction
most significantly improvede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e6

“Three interlighting treatments during flowering and fruit periods had a certain promoting effects in the cucumber fruit growth, and the 8R1B treatment had the most significantly improved effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interlighting during flowering and fruit periods improved cucumber fruit quality

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
interlighting treatments during flowering and fruit periodse7
Outcome
qualities of the cucumber fruitse7
Direction
improvede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L. cv. Shenchun) was planted in greenhouse with 8 h(6:00-11:00;16:30-19:30) of interlighting different light qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–272 · show in text ↑
e7

“The qualities of the cucumber fruits were improved by those interlighting treatments during flowering and fruit periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1493 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.