Paper · 2010

Optimum dose and effects of 60 Co-γ irradiation on potato

Yang Xianquan; Cui Wang; Zhao Pin; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tubers of 3 potato varieties were irradiated by of 60Co γ-irradiation.Effects of irradiation on survival rate,physiological characteristics of seedling stage were analyzed.The results showed that irradiation had remarkable lethal effect on 3 tested varieties,and optimum doses of irradiation were 31.7 ~ 39.9Gy.Irradiation affected seedling development by decreasing seedling rate,delaying seedling stage and extending seedling period.There were different sensitivities among varieties.No distinct morphologic variant was observed in M1.Analyses of physiological characteristics of S6-3 leaves indicated that effect of irradiation on M1 plant was damage and/or suppression.It is suggested that lower dose rate might be applied for mutation inducing;and precisely morphological,physiological,biochemical and molecular biological investigation should be carried out to screen mutant within offspring(VM2) lines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation had a marked lethal effect on the three potato varieties.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
lethal effecte0
Direction
remarkablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“irradiation had remarkable lethal effect on 3 tested varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–258 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated optimum irradiation doses were 31.7–39.9 Gy.

Outcome
optimum doses of irradiatione0
Value
31.7 ~ 39.9Gye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimum doses of irradiation were 31.7 ~ 39.9Gy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation decreased potato seedling rate.

Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
seedling ratee0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irradiation affected seedling development by decreasing seedling rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation delayed the potato seedling stage.

Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
seedling stagee0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irradiation affected seedling development by decreasing seedling rate,delaying seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation extended the potato seedling period.

Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
seedling periode0
Direction
extendinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irradiation affected seedling development by decreasing seedling rate,delaying seedling stage and extending seedling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–434 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato varieties differed in sensitivity to irradiation.

Outcome
different sensitivities among varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were different sensitivities among varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No distinct morphological variant was observed in M1 potato plants.

Material
M1e0
Outcome
No distinct morphologic variante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“No distinct morphologic variant was observed in M1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S6-3 leaf physiology indicated damage or suppression in M1 plants.

Material
S6-3e0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
damage and/or suppressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Analyses of physiological characteristics of S6-3 leaves indicated that effect of irradiation on M1 plant was damage and/or suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–673 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest a lower dose rate for inducing mutations.

Outcome
lower dose rate might be applied for mutation inducinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“It is suggested that lower dose rate might be applied for mutation inducing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–748 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular screening of VM2 offspring.

Outcome
investigation should be carried out to screen mutant within offspring(VM2) linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“precisely morphological,physiological,biochemical and molecular biological investigation should be carried out to screen mutant within offspring(VM2) lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–908 · show in text ↑

radiation · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.