Abstract
The growth status and water holding capacity of branches,stem,leaf and canopy of B.papyrifera with three different stem diameters(A1∶0.5cm≤d1.0cm,A2∶1.0cm≤d1.5cm and A3∶d≥1.5cm)under topping and branch-cutting cultivation patterns were determined by the simple water absorption method to provide the theoretical basis for conservation of water and soil by B.papyriferaafforestation in Karst area.The survival and preserving rate of B.papyrifera both over85%.The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively and the maximum backwater capacity was up to 27.93kg/667m2.The height,ground diameter,root length and average root width of the treatments with three different stem diameters under the topping cultivation pattern after two years all were higher than the treatments under the branchcutting cultivation pattern.Of which,the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree and the maximum backwater capacity reached 61.10kg/667m2.The topping cultivation pattern of B.papyrifera with ≥1.5cm stem diameter was beneficial to growth and water holding of B.papyrifera.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Under topping, growth traits of B. papyrifera after two years were higher than under branch-cutting.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyrifera
Broussonetia papyriferat0 - Treatment
- topping cultivation patterne7
- Outcome
- height,ground diameter,root length and average root widthe7
- Direction
- highere7
- Comparator
- branchcutting cultivation patterne7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“The height,ground diameter,root length and average root width of the treatments with three different stem diameters under the topping cultivation pattern after two years all were higher than the treatments under the branchcutting cultivation pattern”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
height (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 197.37cm after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- heighte1
- Value
- 197.37cme1
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
ground diameter (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 24.70mm after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- ground diametere1
- Value
- 24.70mme1
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
average canopy (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 106.45cm after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- average canopye1
- Value
- 106.45cme1
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
average root width (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 101.61cm after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- average root widthe1
- Value
- 101.61cme1
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
water holding capacity (branch) of B. papyrifera under topping was 11.94g/tree after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- water holding capacitye1
- Value
- 11.94g/treee1
- Qualifier
- branche1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
water holding capacity (stem) of B. papyrifera under topping was 14.9g/tree after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- water holding capacitye1
- Value
- 14.9g/treee1
- Qualifier
- steme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
water holding capacity (leaf) of B. papyrifera under topping was 227.92g/tree after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- water holding capacitye1
- Value
- 227.92g/treee1
- Qualifier
- leafe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The height,ground diameter,average canopy and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern after one year were 197.37cm,24.70mm,106.45cm and 101.61cm,and 11.94g/tree,14.9g/tree and227.92g/tree respectively”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum backwater capacity of B. papyrifera under topping reached 27.93 kg/667 m2 after one year.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- maximum backwater capacitye3
- Value
- 27.93kg/667m2e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“the maximum backwater capacity was up to 27.93kg/667m2”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
height (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 243.44cm after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- heighte2
- Value
- 243.44cme2
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
ground diameter (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 40.73cm after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- ground diametere2
- Value
- 40.73cme2
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
root length (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 134.89cm after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- root lengthe2
- Value
- 134.89cme2
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
average root width (topping cultivation pattern) of B. papyrifera under topping was 104.22cm after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- average root widthe2
- Value
- 104.22cme2
- Qualifier
- topping cultivation patterne2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
water holding capacity (branch) of B. papyrifera under topping was 49.09g/tree after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- water holding capacitye2
- Value
- 49.09g/treee2
- Qualifier
- branche2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
water holding capacity (stem) of B. papyrifera under topping was 31.1g/tree after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- water holding capacitye2
- Value
- 31.1g/treee2
- Qualifier
- steme2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
water holding capacity (leaf) of B. papyrifera under topping was 514.3g/tree after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- water holding capacitye2
- Value
- 514.3g/treee2
- Qualifier
- leafe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“the height,ground diameter,root length and average root width,and water holding capacity of branch,stem and leaf of the treatment with≥1.5cm stem diameter under the topping cultivation pattern were 243.44cm,40.73cm,134.89cm and 104.22cm,49.09g/tree,31.1g/tree and 514.3g/tree”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum backwater capacity of B. papyrifera under topping reached 61.10 kg/667 m2 after two years.
- Taxon
- Broussonetia papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferat0
- Outcome
- maximum backwater capacitye4
- Value
- 61.10kg/667m2e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“the maximum backwater capacity reached 61.10kg/667m2”
t0“Broussonetia papyrifera”
Claim · model-written summary
The survival and preserving rate of B. papyrifera was over 85%.
- Taxon
- B.papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferae5
- Outcome
- survival and preserving ratee5
- Value
- over85%e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The survival and preserving rate of B.papyrifera both over85%”
Claim · model-written summary
Topping with stems of 1.5 cm or more was beneficial to growth and water holding of B. papyrifera.
- Taxon
- B.papyriferaBroussonetia papyriferae6
- Treatment
- topping cultivation patterne6
- Outcome
- growth and water holdinge6
- Direction
- beneficiale6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The topping cultivation pattern of B.papyrifera with ≥1.5cm stem diameter was beneficial to growth and water holding of B.papyrifera”