Paper · 2003 · Zhongguo shuidao kexue

Effects of Different Irrigation Patterns on Physiological Characteristics of Root and Photosynthetic Traits of Flag Leaf after Floweri ng Stage in Hybrid Rice

Zeng Xiang

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The physiological characteristics of root and flag leaf in two hybrid rice, Ho nglianyou 6 and Liangyou 1193, after flowering stage under different irrigation patterns were studied. Root density and activity were higher under controlled damp irrigation than those of submerged irrigation. Chlorophyll contents in f lag leaf under controlled damp irrigation were not different at flowering stage, but distinctly higher at mature stage compared with that under submerged irriga tion. Net photosynthetic rate of flag leaf under controlled damp irrigation also significantly higher than that of submerged irrigation at reproductive stag e. Compared with submerged irrigation, two hybrid rice combinations had higher community growth rate(CGR) and relative growth rate(RGR), and obtained higher g rain yield under controlled damp irrigation. The higher yield might result fr om enhancement of the dry matter accumulation favorable to the grain developmen t at reproductive stage under controlled damp irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled damp irrigation increased root density and activity relative to submerged irrigation.

Taxon
Hybrid RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
controlled damp irrigatione0
Outcome
Root density and activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
submerged irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root density and activity were higher under controlled damp irrigation than those of submerged irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf chlorophyll content did not differ at flowering under controlled damp versus submerged irrigation.

Taxon
Hybrid RiceOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
f lag leafe0
Treatment
controlled damp irrigatione0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
not differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorophyll contents in f lag leaf under controlled damp irrigation were not different at flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf chlorophyll content was higher at maturity under controlled damp irrigation than submerged irrigation.

Taxon
Hybrid RiceOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
f lag leafe0
Treatment
controlled damp irrigatione0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
distinctly highere0
Qualifier
mature stagee0
Comparator
submerged irriga tione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorophyll contents in f lag leaf under controlled damp irrigation were not different at flowering stage, but distinctly higher at mature stage compared with that under submerged irriga tion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf net photosynthetic rate was significantly higher under controlled damp irrigation than submerged irrigation.

Taxon
Hybrid RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
controlled damp irrigatione0
Outcome
Net photosynthetic rate of flag leafe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
reproductive stag ee0
Comparator
submerged irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e0

“Net photosynthetic rate of flag leaf under controlled damp irrigation also significantly higher than that of submerged irrigation at reproductive stag e.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled damp irrigation raised community and relative growth rates versus submerged irrigation.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativae0
Outcome
community growth rate(CGR) and relative growth rate(RGR)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
submerged irrigatione0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with submerged irrigation, two hybrid rice combinations had higher community growth rate(CGR) and relative growth rate(RGR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled damp irrigation increased grain yield relative to submerged irrigation.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
controlled damp irrigatione0
Outcome
g rain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
submerged irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with submerged irrigation, two hybrid rice combinations had higher community growth rate(CGR) and relative growth rate(RGR), and obtained higher g rain yield under controlled damp irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–836 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed the higher yield to improved dry matter accumulation favorable to grain development.

Taxon
Hybrid RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment
controlled damp irrigatione0
Outcome
higher yielde0
Qualifier
enhancement of the dry matter accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hybrid Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher yield might result fr om enhancement of the dry matter accumulation favorable to the grain developmen t at reproductive stage under controlled damp irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1007 · show in text ↑

2'-deoxyadenosine 5'-monophosphate · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

2'-deoxyadenosine 5'-monophosphate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.