Paper · 2008 · Northern Horticulture

Effect of Nitrogen and Sulfur Application on Growth and Nutrition Quality Indices in Turnip (Brassica rapa L.)

Fengming Ma

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of nitrogen and sulfur application on growth and nutrition quality indices in turnip (Brassica rapa L. HY., BY.) was studied. The results showed that yields of two HY. did significantly increase in response to N application, respectively. In this experiment, we got the highest yields at 160 kg·ha-1 N supply. Vc concentration and soluble sugar concentration that were in roots of HY. did significantly decrease by N application. The average of Vc concentration in leaf was 2.73 folds of the root. There were no significant difference to Vc concentration of BY. leaves, soluble sugar of BY. roots and Vc concentration of HY. at S levels. Increasing N fertilization resulted in higher Fe, Ca, B and Zn concentrations. And Increasing S fertilization could not improve the uptake of microelement in HY. and BY. There were significent difference to Fe, Zn, Ca, B concentrations of HY. and Mn, Ca, B concentrations of HY. at N and S interaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased HY. yields.

Material
HY.e0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields of two HY. did significantly increase in response to N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–230 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest turnip yields occurred with 160 kg·ha-1 N supply.

Treatment
160 kg·ha-1 N supplye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we got the highest yields at 160 kg·ha-1 N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly decreased root Vc concentration in HY.

Material
HY.e0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
Vc concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vc concentration and soluble sugar concentration that were in roots of HY. did significantly decrease by N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly decreased root soluble sugar concentration in HY.

Material
HY.e0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
soluble sugar concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vc concentration and soluble sugar concentration that were in roots of HY. did significantly decrease by N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average leaf Vc concentration was 2.73 folds that of the root.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Vc concentratione0
Value
2.73 foldse0
Comparator
roote0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average of Vc concentration in leaf was 2.73 folds of the root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur levels did not significantly affect BY. leaf Vc concentration.

Material
BY.e0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
S levelse0
Outcome
Vc concentratione0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant difference to Vc concentration of BY. leaves, soluble sugar of BY. roots and Vc concentration of HY. at S levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur levels did not significantly affect BY. root soluble sugar.

Material
BY.e0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
S levelse0
Outcome
soluble sugare0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant difference to Vc concentration of BY. leaves, soluble sugar of BY. roots and Vc concentration of HY. at S levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur levels did not significantly affect HY. Vc concentration.

Material
HY.e0
Treatment
S levelse0
Outcome
Vc concentratione0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant difference to Vc concentration of BY. leaves, soluble sugar of BY. roots and Vc concentration of HY. at S levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization raised Fe, Ca, B and Zn concentrations.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Fe, Ca, B and Zn concentrationse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N fertilization resulted in higher Fe, Ca, B and Zn concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulfur fertilization did not improve microelement uptake in HY. and BY.

Treatment
S fertilizatione0
Outcome
uptake of microelemente0
Direction
could not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing S fertilization could not improve the uptake of microelement in HY. and BY.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and sulfur interaction significantly affected Fe, Zn, Ca and B concentrations in HY.

Material
HY.e0
Treatment
N and S interactione0
Outcome
Fe, Zn, Ca, B concentrationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significent difference to Fe, Zn, Ca, B concentrations of HY. and Mn, Ca, B concentrations of HY. at N and S interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and sulfur interaction significantly affected Mn, Ca and B concentrations in HY.

Material
HY.e0
Treatment
N and S interactione0
Outcome
Mn, Ca, B concentrationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significent difference to Fe, Zn, Ca, B concentrations of HY. and Mn, Ca, B concentrations of HY. at N and S interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“turnip”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 37 positive, 6 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 69 positive, 11 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.