Abstract
Some nutrient compositions of grafting and own root cucumber′s product were studied.The result showed that the vC content of grafting cucumber debased a little,the soluble protein and sugar content increased,and the water content had no obvious difference between grafting and own root cucumber,but the flavor of grafting cucumber was inferior to that of own root cucumber.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber had slightly lower vitamin C content than own-root cucumber.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0 - Treatment
- graftinge2
- Outcome
- vC contente1
- Direction
- debased a littlee1
- Comparator
- own root cucumbere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e1“the vC content of grafting cucumber debased a little”
e2“Some nutrient compositions of grafting and own root cucumber′s product were studied.”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber had higher soluble protein and sugar content.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- graftinge2
- Outcome
- soluble protein and sugar contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- own root cucumbere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e1“the soluble protein and sugar content increased”
e2“Some nutrient compositions of grafting and own root cucumber′s product were studied.”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted and own-root cucumber did not obviously differ in water content.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- graftinge2
- Outcome
- water contente1
- Direction
- no obvious differencee1
- Comparator
- own root cucumbere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e1“the water content had no obvious difference between grafting and own root cucumber”
e2“Some nutrient compositions of grafting and own root cucumber′s product were studied.”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted cucumber had inferior flavor to own-root cucumber.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- graftinge2
- Outcome
- flavore1
- Direction
- inferiore1
- Comparator
- own root cucumbere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cucumber”
e1“the flavor of grafting cucumber was inferior to that of own root cucumber”
e2“Some nutrient compositions of grafting and own root cucumber′s product were studied.”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →grafting · soil: physics · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
grafting · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →grafting · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.