Paper · 2003

Biocontrol Efficacy of Two Antagonistic Yeasts Against Postharvest Diseases in Peach Fruits During Storage Periods

Qin Guo-zheng

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two antagonistic yeasts, Thichosporon pullulans and Cryptococcus laurentii, were investigated for their biocontrol potential to blue mold rot and rhizopus rot on harvested peach fruits(Prunus persica L. Batsch, cv. Okubao), alone or in combination with a low dose of iprodione(50 μg ml-1). The results indicated that T. pullulans and C. laurentii were effective at reducing disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus rot in peach fruits. Biocontrol efficacy of C. laurentii and T. pullulans were significantly enhanced by combination with a low dose of iprodione(50 μg ml-1)against blue mold and rhizopus rot in peach fruits. T. pullulans and C. laurentii combined with a low dose of iprodione(50 μg ml-1)resulted in better disease control than either iprodione or the yeasts used alone. Dipping fruits in suspensions of antagonist cells showed the similar control effect as the treatment with iprodione(500μg ml-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. pullulans reduced incidence and severity of blue mold and rhizopus rot in peach fruit.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
T. pullulanse0
Interactor
T. pullulanse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus rote0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. pullulans and C. laurentii were effective at reducing disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus rot in peach fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. laurentii reduced incidence and severity of blue mold and rhizopus rot in peach fruit.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
C. laurentiie0
Interactor
C. laurentiiPapiliotrema laurentiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus rote0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. pullulans and C. laurentii were effective at reducing disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus rot in peach fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining C. laurentii with low-dose iprodione significantly enhanced control of both peach rots.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
combination with a low dose of iprodione(50 μg ml-1)e0
Interactor
C. laurentiiPapiliotrema laurentiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Biocontrol efficacy of C. laurentiie0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biocontrol efficacy of C. laurentii and T. pullulans were significantly enhanced by combination with a low dose of iprodione(50 μg ml-1)against blue mold and rhizopus rot in peach fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining T. pullulans with low-dose iprodione significantly enhanced control of both peach rots.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
combination with a low dose of iprodione(50 μg ml-1)e0
Interactor
T. pullulanse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. pullulanse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biocontrol efficacy of C. laurentii and T. pullulans were significantly enhanced by combination with a low dose of iprodione(50 μg ml-1)against blue mold and rhizopus rot in peach fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonist-cell dipping gave control similar to 500μg ml-1 iprodione.

Treatment
Dipping fruits in suspensions of antagonist cellse0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
treatment with iprodione(500μg ml-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping fruits in suspensions of antagonist cells showed the similar control effect as the treatment with iprodione(500μg ml-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–91 · show in text ↑

pullulans · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Papiliotrema laurentii · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · control · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · control · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.