Paper · 2003 · Zhongguo Nong ye ke xue = Zhongguo Nongye Kexue

Biocontrol of Postharvest Diseases in Peach Fruits Using Two A ntagonistic Yeasts During Storage Periods

Lin Li; Shiping Tian; Qin Guo-zheng; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two antagonistic yeasts, Thichosporon pullulans a nd Cryptococcus laurentii, used alone or combinated with iprodione, were evalu ated for their biocontrol potential to blue mold rot and rhizopus rot of harvest ed peach fruits (Prunus persica L. Batsch, cv. Okubao) during storage. Peach fruits were wounded and artificially inoculated with spores of Rhizopus stolo nifer or Penicillium expansum following the application of antagonistic ye asts. In order to determine the effects of the antagonistic yeasts against decay on peach fruits in non-inoculation situation, peach fruits were dipped in susp ensions of the yeasts with a concentration of 10 8 cfu·ml -1 or in iprodi one of 500 μg·ml -1 . All the fruits were stored at 5℃ or 25℃ after trea tme nts. The results indicated that T. pullulans and C. laurentii were effec tive for reducing disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus r ot in peach fruits. T. pullulans and C. laurentii combined with a low do se of iprodione (50 μg·ml -1 ) resulted in better disease control than eit h er iprodione or the yeasts used alone. The results also showed that blue mold ro t and rhizopus rot were the main diseases of harvested peach fruits during stora ge. Dipping fruits in suspensions of antagonist cells showed the similar control effect as the treatment with iprodione (500 μg·ml -1 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. pullulans reduced blue mold incidence and severity in peach.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
T. pullulanse0
Interactor
blue mold rote0pathogen
Second interactor
T. pullulanse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and severity of blue mold rote0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. pullulans and C. laurentii were effec tive for reducing disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus r ot in peach fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. laurentii reduced blue mold incidence and severity in peach.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
C. laurentiie0
Interactor
blue mold rote0pathogen
Second interactor
C. laurentiiPapiliotrema laurentiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence and severity of blue mold rote0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. pullulans and C. laurentii were effec tive for reducing disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus r ot in peach fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yeasts also reduced rhizopus rot incidence and severity.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Treatment
T. pullulans and C. laurentiie0
Interactor
rhizopus r ote0pathogen
Outcome
rhizopus r ote0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. pullulans and C. laurentii were effec tive for reducing disease incidence and severity of blue mold rot and rhizopus r ot in peach fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast plus low-dose iprodione controlled disease better than iprodione or yeasts alone.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
T. pullulans and C. laurentii combined with a low do se of iprodione (50 μg·ml -1 )e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
ipro dionee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. pullulans and C. laurentii combined with a low do se of iprodione (50 μg·ml -1 ) resulted in better disease control than eit h er iprodione or the yeasts used alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue mold and rhizopus rot were the main storage diseases of peach.

Taxon
peach fruitsPrunus persicae0
Interactor
blue mold ro te0pathogen
Second interactor
rhizopus rote0pathogen
Outcome
main diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue mold ro t and rhizopus rot were the main diseases of harvested peach fruits during stora ge.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping in antagonist cells had similar control effect to iprodione.

Taxon
Peach FruitsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Dipping fruits in suspensions of antagonist cellse0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
treatment with iprodione (500 μg·ml -1 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping fruits in suspensions of antagonist cells showed the similar control effect as the treatment with iprodione (500 μg·ml -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑

pullulans · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Papiliotrema laurentii · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · control · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · control · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.