Paper · 2011 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Flood Disasters on Summer Maize's Characters and Yield in Different Areas of Henan Province

Xiangyan Li

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to quantitatively explore effects of flood disasters on summer maize's characters and yield in different areas of Henan Province.[Method] A simulation test was carried out in Zhumadian and Puyang areas of Henan Province in 2008 and 2009,which accounted for a number of factors,especially the flooded days and flooding period.Finally,the evaluation model of maize yield loss was studied.[Result] Flooding had obvious effects on the mortality,spike rate and grain weight per plant of summer corn,while the plant height,ear length,ear diameter,100-seed weight and bald rate were less affected.The same flooding days and period had different effects on summer corn of Henan different areas.1 day flooding had little effect on corn production,while more than 3 days flooding led to over 30% reduction.More than 5 and 7 days flooding led to over 50% and 70% reduction,respectively.During the jointing stage,7 days flooding resulted in a total failure for summer corn,and this was also the same case for 7 days flooding during the anthesis stage.Flooding in the jointing stage resulted in more damage than in the anthesis stage for corn's characters and yield.During the jointing stage,the evaluation model of flooded days and maize yield loss was Yjointing =-0.347 5Xjointing3 + 2.829 2Xjointing2 +10.162 0Xjointing-2.375 5,R2=0.895 8;during the anthesis stage,it was Yanthesis=-0.193 6Xanthesis3 + 2.077 2Xanthesis2+ 7.372 1Xanthesis-2.266 2,R2=0.949 7.[Conclusion] The research provides reference for studies on flood monitoring and fast evaluation of disaster damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding strongly affected summer corn mortality, spike rate and grain weight per plant.

Taxon
summer cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
Treatment
Floodinge0
Outcome
mortality,spike rate and grain weight per plante0
Direction
obvious effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flooding had obvious effects on the mortality,spike rate and grain weight per plant of summer corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding affected plant height, ear length, ear diameter, 100-seed weight and bald rate less.

Outcome
plant height,ear length,ear diameter,100-seed weight and bald ratee0
Direction
less affectede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while the plant height,ear length,ear diameter,100-seed weight and bald rate were less affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–613 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Identical flood duration and stage affected summer corn differently across Henan areas.

Taxon
summer cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
Outcome
different effectse0
Setting
Henane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same flooding days and period had different effects on summer corn of Henan different areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One day of flooding had little effect on corn production.

Treatment
1 day floodinge0
Outcome
corn productione0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1 day flooding had little effect on corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than three days of flooding reduced corn production by over 30%.

Treatment
more than 3 days floodinge0
Direction
reductione0
Value
over 30%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“more than 3 days flooding led to over 30% reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than five days of flooding reduced corn production by over 50%.

Treatment
More than 5e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
over 50%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“More than 5 and 7 days flooding led to over 50% and 70% reduction,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than seven days of flooding reduced corn production by over 70%.

Treatment
7 days floodinge0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“More than 5 and 7 days flooding led to over 50% and 70% reduction,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of flooding at jointing caused total failure of summer corn.

Taxon
summer cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
Organ / stage
jointing stagee0
Treatment
7 days floodinge0
Outcome
total failuree0
Direction
total failuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the jointing stage,7 days flooding resulted in a total failure for summer corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of flooding at anthesis caused total failure of summer corn.

Organ / stage
anthesis stagee0
Treatment
7 days floodinge0
Outcome
same casee0
Direction
same casee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this was also the same case for 7 days flooding during the anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding at jointing caused more damage to corn traits and yield than flooding at anthesis.

Treatment
Flooding in the jointing stagee0
Outcome
corn's characters and yielde0
Direction
more damagee0
Comparator
anthesis stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flooding in the jointing stage resulted in more damage than in the anthesis stage for corn's characters and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1176 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A jointing-stage flood-duration model explained maize yield loss with R2 of 0.895 8.

Outcome
maize yield losse0
Value
R2=0.895 8e0

Verbatim

e0

“During the jointing stage,the evaluation model of flooded days and maize yield loss was Yjointing =-0.347 5Xjointing3 + 2.829 2Xjointing2 +10.162 0Xjointing-2.375 5,R2=0.895 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1352 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An anthesis-stage flood-duration model explained maize yield loss with R2 of 0.949 7.

Outcome
Yanthesise0
Value
R2=0.949 7e0

Verbatim

e0

“during the anthesis stage,it was Yanthesis=-0.193 6Xanthesis3 + 2.077 2Xanthesis2+ 7.372 1Xanthesis-2.266 2,R2=0.949 7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1471 · show in text ↑

flooding · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

flooding · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 6 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.