Paper · 2011 · Journal of Changjiang Vegetables

Effect of Grafting Methods on Grafting Working Efficiency,Seedlings Growth and Fruit Quality of Watermelon

Bie Zhilong

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The hole insertion and root pruning hole insertion grafting methods were often used in the production of grafted seedling in industrial scale,the present study investigated the effects of the two grafting methods on grafting working efficiency,seedlings growth and fruit quality of watermelon.The results showed that the grafting speed,survival rate and grafting working efficiency of root pruning hole insertion method was significantly higher than those of hole insertion method.Compared with hole insertion grafted watermelon seedlings,root pruning hole insertion grafted seedlings have higher seedling quality as well as higher root/shoot dry weight ratio and root activity.However,there were no significant effect on plant growth and fruit quality of watermelon between the two grafting methods.Thus,the root pruning hole insertion grafting was an effective method for the production of grafted watermelon seedlings in industrial scale.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning hole insertion increased grafting speed, survival rate and working efficiency relative to hole insertion.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
root pruning hole insertion methode0
Outcome
grafting speed,survival rate and grafting working efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
hole insertion methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the grafting speed,survival rate and grafting working efficiency of root pruning hole insertion method was significantly higher than those of hole insertion method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning hole insertion seedlings had higher seedling quality, root/shoot dry weight ratio and root activity.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
root pruning hole insertion grafted seedlingse0
Outcome
seedling quality as well as higher root/shoot dry weight ratio and root activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
hole insertion grafted watermelon seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with hole insertion grafted watermelon seedlings,root pruning hole insertion grafted seedlings have higher seedling quality as well as higher root/shoot dry weight ratio and root activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth and fruit quality did not differ significantly between grafting methods.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
the two grafting methodse0
Outcome
plant growth and fruit qualitye0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant effect on plant growth and fruit quality of watermelon between the two grafting methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–800 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend root pruning hole insertion for industrial production of grafted watermelon seedlings.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
root pruning hole insertion graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root pruning hole insertion grafting was an effective method for the production of grafted watermelon seedlings in industrial scale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–941 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: general · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

grafting · quality: grain · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pruning · survival · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.